Literature DB >> 17523729

Weekly Gemcitabine plus Fluorouracil-Folinic Acid Given Weekly for Two Days in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer : A Phase II Study.

Aristides Polyzos1, Nicholas Tsavaris, Christos Kosmas, Helen Gogas, George Koutinos, Nicholas I Nikiteas, Evangelos Felekouras, Gregory Kouraklis, Othon Papadopoulos, Antonios Papachristodoulou, Demetrios Stamatiadis, Michael Safioleas, George Nikou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine administration followed by the combination of fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by folinic acid in patients with advanced, symptomatic pancreatic cancer. The main objective was to estimate tumour response and any improvement in patients' quality of life. PATIENTS: The study included 48 evaluable patients with metastatic disease with no prior chemotherapy. The study duration was 3 years.
INTERVENTIONS: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) intravenously was given on days 1 and 8 followed by fluorouracil 350 mg/m(2) intravenously as a bolus biologically modulated by folinic acid 350 mg/m(2) intravenously given on days 1, 2, 8 and 9 in order to develop the conditions for any potential drug synergism. The regimen was administered every 3 weeks for 1 year or until disease progression.
RESULTS: Objective partial responses were documented in ten (21%) patients (95% CI 10.5, 35). Twenty-two (46%) patients had stable disease while 16 (33%) patients had progressive disease. The median response duration was 8 months (range 4-20). The median time to progression was 6 months (range 2-24), while the median survival of the group was 7 months (range 3-36) and the probability of surviving beyond 12 months was 20%. Of the 44 patients with tumour-related symptoms who were considered evaluable for clinical-benefit response, 28 (70%) patients had pain improvement, 25 (52%) patients had improvement of their performance status, and nine (28%) patients experienced weight gain during treatment. Serum concentrations of cancer antigen (Ca-19-9) were decreased by more than 50% in 14 (37%) of the 38 assessable patients. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with mild myelotoxicity. Gastrointestinal toxicity was moderate with mild mucositis.
CONCLUSION: The regimen of gemcitabine and fluorouracil administered in this study was well tolerated and showed a moderate antitumour activity and a significant palliative effect on tumour-related symptoms. Because fluorouracil is a low toxicity combination agent for gemcitabine, other forms of the two-drug combination warrant further investigation.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 17523729     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200424110-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  32 in total

Review 1.  Interactions between angiotensin II and the sympathetic nervous system in the the long-term control of arterial pressure.

Authors:  V L Brooks
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.557

2.  Nocturnal blood pressure fall on ambulatory monitoring in a large international database. The "Ad Hoc' Working Group.

Authors:  J A Staessen; L Bieniaszewski; E O'Brien; P Gosse; H Hayashi; Y Imai; T Kawasaki; K Otsuka; P Palatini; L Thijs; R Fagard
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Effects of losartan and its combination with quinapril on the cardiac sympathetic nervous system and neurohormonal status in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Sakata; Hiroshi Yoshida; Kazuhiko Obayashi; Joji Ishikawa; Hiromichi Tamekiyo; Ryuzo Nawada; Osamu Doi
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Effect of losartan on heart rate and blood pressure variability during tilt test and trinitroglycerine vasodilation.

Authors:  P Pancera; B Presciuttini; S Sansone; L Montagna; F Paluani; G Covi; A Lechi
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Effects of selective angiotensin II receptor blockade on sympathetic nerve activity in primary hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  Jan Struck; Philip Muck; Daniel Trübger; Renate Handrock; Gottfried Weidinger; Andreas Dendorfer; Christoph Dodt
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Differing effects of age on heart rate variability in men and women.

Authors:  P K Stein; R E Kleiger; J N Rottman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Modulation of sympathetic control by ACE inhibitors.

Authors:  P Dominiak
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Improved baroreflex sensitivity in elderly hypertensives on lisinopril is not explained by blood pressure reduction alone.

Authors:  B M Egan; M J Fleissner; K Stepniakowski; J M Neahring; K B Sagar; T J Ebert
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Vagal cardiac activity in essential hypertension: the effects of metoprolol and ramipril.

Authors:  R K Vesalainen; I M Kantola; K E Airaksinen; K U Tahvanainen; T J Kaila
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Effect of atenolol and diltiazem on heart period variability in normal persons.

Authors:  J R Cook; J T Bigger; R E Kleiger; J L Fleiss; R C Steinman; L M Rolnitzky
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.