Literature DB >> 17522515

Gallbladder cancer: the role of laparoscopy and radical resection.

Samuel P Shih1, Richard D Schulick, John L Cameron, Keith D Lillemoe, Henry A Pitt, Michael A Choti, Kurtis A Campbell, Charles J Yeo, Mark A Talamini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We assess how laparoscopy has altered the presentation of patients with gallbladder cancer and determine whether radical resection in patients with gallbladder cancer is beneficial. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The widespread adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to an increased frequency of incidentally discovered gallbladder carcinoma. Little data exist to guide surgeons in the optimum management of patients with gallbladder cancer, particularly with respect to the potential advantages of radical resection.
METHODS: Records of 107 patients with gallbladder cancer admitted to a tertiary academic medical center between 1995 and 2004 were reviewed. Gallbladder cancer was found incidentally in 53 patients (50%). Fifty-two of these patients underwent a routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were found to have gallbladder cancer intraoperatively or following the operation by subsequent pathologic evaluation of the specimen. Gallbladder cancer had been diagnosed preoperatively by radiology in the other 54 patients (50%). These patients did not undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were explored electively.
RESULTS: The median age at presentation was 67 years and 66% were female. Patients who were found to have gallbladder carcinoma incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a significant increase in survival when compared with those who were admitted electively with a known diagnosis (P < 0.001). All patients who presented with a known diagnosis had stage II or greater disease, and 36% of these were stage IV carcinomas. However, 82% of those patients who were found incidentally were stage I or II. The overall 5-year survival for all patients was 15%; those discovered incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a 5-year survival of 33%. This difference was significant among patients with stage II carcinomas. In the laparoscopic group, there was no difference in survival between the patients who were immediately converted to an open resection when identified to have gallbladder cancer intraoperatively (n = 6) and those who had a completed laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were re-explored at a later point when found to have gallbladder cancer by subsequent pathology (n = 33). There was a significant improvement in survival in 50 patients (47%) who underwent some form of radical resection (P < 0.001). Stage for stage comparison showed that this was significant in stage II disease. Patients who underwent hepatic resection along with lymphadenectomy and extra hepatic biliary resection had similar survival compared with those who had hepatic resection and lymphadenectomy alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to have resulted in the earlier discovery of gallbladder cancer in some patients, resulting in increased probability of survival. Patients discovered with gallbladder carcinoma during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy do not have to be converted immediately to an open resection and should be referred to a tertiary care center for further exploration. Adjunctive radical surgical resection, either at the time of cholecystectomy or subsequently, increases survival significantly in early stage disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17522515      PMCID: PMC1876959          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31806beec2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  38 in total

Review 1.  Gallbladder cancer: recent advances and current guidelines for surgical therapy.

Authors:  Y Fong; S Malhotra
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2001

2.  Gallbladder cancer: comparison of patients presenting initially for definitive operation with those presenting after prior noncurative intervention.

Authors:  Y Fong; W Jarnagin; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  How to proceed in patients with carcinoma detected after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D Frauenschuh; R Greim; E Kraas
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century?

Authors:  Eldon A Shaffer
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-05

Review 5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and unsuspected gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  F Romano; C Franciosi; R Caprotti; S De Fina; G Porta; G Visintini; F Uggeri
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  A Wysocki; A Bobrzynski; J Krzywon; A Budzynski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Port site metastases after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  O Lundberg
Journal:  Eur J Surg Suppl       Date:  2000

8.  Outcomes of aggressive treatment of stage IV gallbladder cancer and predictors of survival.

Authors:  T Todoroki; H Takahashi; N Koike; T Kawamoto; T Kondo; S Yoshida; H Kashiwagi; M Otsuka; K Fukao; Y Saida
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

9.  Regional and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in radical surgery for advanced gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  S Kondo; Y Nimura; N Hayakawa; J Kamiya; M Nagino; K Uesaka
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  The National Cancer Data Base report on carcinoma of the gallbladder, 1989-1995.

Authors:  J H Donohue; A K Stewart; H R Menck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  79 in total

1.  Relevance of residual disease after liver resection for incidental gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Javier C Lendoire; Luis Gil; Fernando Duek; Carlos Quarin; Verónica Garay; Gabriel Raffin; Marcelo Rivaldi; Oks Alejandra; Oscar Imventarza
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Radical resection of gallbladder cancer: could it be robotic?

Authors:  Bai-Yong Shen; Qian Zhan; Xia-Xing Deng; Han Bo; Qin Liu; Cheng-Hong Peng; Hong-Wei Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Incidental gallbladder cancers: Our clinical experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Yiğit Düzköylü; Hasan Bektaş; Zeynep Deniz Kozluklu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-06-24

5.  Implications of the index cholecystectomy and timing of referral for radical resection of advanced incidental gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  T Tsirlis; F Ausania; S A White; J J French; B C Jaques; R M Charnley; D M Manas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Adequate extent in radical re-resection of incidental gallbladder carcinoma: analysis of the German Registry.

Authors:  Thorsten Oliver Goetze; Vittorio Paolucci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparative analysis between clinical outcomes of primary radical resection and second completion radical resection for T2 gallbladder cancer: single-center experience.

Authors:  Seong Yeon Cho; Sang-Jae Park; Seong Hoon Kim; Sung-Sik Han; Young-Kyu Kim; Kwang-Woong Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Laparoscopic approach to gastrointestinal malignancies: toward the future with caution.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Marco Bernini; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Incidental pT2-T3 gallbladder cancer after a cholecystectomy: outcome of staging at 3 months prior to a radical resection.

Authors:  Fabio Ausania; Theodoris Tsirlis; Steven A White; Jeremy J French; Bryon C Jaques; Richard M Charnley; Derek M Manas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Intraluminal versus infiltrating gallbladder carcinoma: clinical presentation, ultrasound and computed tomography.

Authors:  Tze-Yu Lee; Sheung-Fat Ko; Chung-Cheng Huang; Shu-Hang Ng; Jiun-Lung Liang; Hsuan-Ying Huang; Min-Chi Chen; Shyr-Ming Sheen-Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.