Marcelo T Berlim1, Gustavo Turecki. 1. 6875 LaSalle Blvd., Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Frank B. Common Pavilion, Rm. F-3125, Montréal, Québec, Canada H4H 1R3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To summarize and discuss the conceptual and operational definitions of treatment resistant/refractory depression (TRD) by systematically reviewing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on its somatic treatment. DATA SOURCES: We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and EMBASE for potentially relevant RCTs on the somatic treatment of TRD published from January 1996 to June 2006. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they: (a) enrolled patients at least 18 years old with a primary diagnosis of unipolar major depression considered resistant/refractory to treatment at baseline, (b) had a randomized design, (c) were published in peer-reviewed journals, and (d) were written in English. Trials that enrolled patients with secondary depression were excluded from our review. Finally, the bibliographies of relevant articles were hand-searched for additional references. In total, 233 full electronic references were retrieved, from which 47 meet the inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Through a standardized form, we collected data describing the diagnostic procedure, the terminology and definition of TRD employed, the methodology for assessing the adequacy of previous treatments (in terms of type of ascertainment, dose, and duration), and the minimum required depressive symptoms at baseline. DATA SYNTHESIS: Overall, RCTs diverged regarding the majority of the conceptual and methodological issues involved in the ascertainment of TRD. For example, eleven terms were used to describe resistance/refractoriness in depression, and six different criteria were employed to define the categorical presence of TRD (ranging form non-response to one antidepressant to non-response to two or more antidepressants from different pharmacological classes). Regarding the evaluation of previous treatments, the majority of RCTs did not use systematic methods to gather data, and diverge substantially on the minimum acceptable medication doses and trial durations. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need for an internationally shared framework of concepts and methods for the investigation of TRD that could reduce current idiosyncrasies and provide a reference system. Such a foundation is essential for the interpretation of research findings and for their translation to clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize and discuss the conceptual and operational definitions of treatment resistant/refractory depression (TRD) by systematically reviewing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on its somatic treatment. DATA SOURCES: We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and EMBASE for potentially relevant RCTs on the somatic treatment of TRD published from January 1996 to June 2006. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they: (a) enrolled patients at least 18 years old with a primary diagnosis of unipolar major depression considered resistant/refractory to treatment at baseline, (b) had a randomized design, (c) were published in peer-reviewed journals, and (d) were written in English. Trials that enrolled patients with secondary depression were excluded from our review. Finally, the bibliographies of relevant articles were hand-searched for additional references. In total, 233 full electronic references were retrieved, from which 47 meet the inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Through a standardized form, we collected data describing the diagnostic procedure, the terminology and definition of TRD employed, the methodology for assessing the adequacy of previous treatments (in terms of type of ascertainment, dose, and duration), and the minimum required depressive symptoms at baseline. DATA SYNTHESIS: Overall, RCTs diverged regarding the majority of the conceptual and methodological issues involved in the ascertainment of TRD. For example, eleven terms were used to describe resistance/refractoriness in depression, and six different criteria were employed to define the categorical presence of TRD (ranging form non-response to one antidepressant to non-response to two or more antidepressants from different pharmacological classes). Regarding the evaluation of previous treatments, the majority of RCTs did not use systematic methods to gather data, and diverge substantially on the minimum acceptable medication doses and trial durations. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need for an internationally shared framework of concepts and methods for the investigation of TRD that could reduce current idiosyncrasies and provide a reference system. Such a foundation is essential for the interpretation of research findings and for their translation to clinical practice.
Authors: Gregory L Sahlem; William V McCall; E Baron Short; Peter B Rosenquist; James B Fox; Nagy A Youssef; Andrew J Manett; Suzanne E Kerns; Morgan M Dancy; Laryssa McCloud; Mark S George; Harold A Sackeim Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Helge H Müller; Udo Reulbach; Juan Manuel Maler; Johannes Kornhuber; Wolfgang Sperling Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 3.575