Literature DB >> 17521119

Methods for using nutrient intake values (NIVs) to assess or plan nutrient intakes.

Suzanne P Murphy1, Hester H Vorster.   

Abstract

This article describes the methods for using nutrient intake values (NIVs) to plan and assess intakes of both individuals and population groups. The advantages of the more recent standards, which use an average nutrient requirement (ANR) and its standard deviation to describe the distribution of nutrient requirements, are highlighted. The goal of assessing the intake of an individual is to determine the probability that the person's usual diet is meeting his or her nutrient needs and whether the person is at risk for adverse effects from excessive intakes, whereas the goal of planning an individual's intake is to ensure that the probability of inadequate intake and the likelihood of excessive intake are both small. The goal of assessing intakes of groups is to determine the prevalence of inadequate intakes and the prevalence of potentially excessive intakes, whereas the goal of planning nutrient intakes for groups is to minimize the prevalence of inadequate intakes and also to minimize the prevalence of potentially excessive intakes. For all of these goals, it is important to utilize appropriate food-composition tables and accurate dietary assessment methods. To fully utilize the new paradigm, it will be necessary for the professional nutrition community to identify ways to implement these new procedures in nutrition research and nutrition programs, to describe the strengths and weaknesses of the results, and to contribute to the evolution of both the theory and the application of the NIVs when planning and assessing diets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17521119     DOI: 10.1177/15648265070281S106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Nutr Bull        ISSN: 0379-5721            Impact factor:   2.069


  5 in total

1.  Framework of Methodology to Assess the Link between A Posteriori Dietary Patterns and Nutritional Adequacy: Application to Pregnancy.

Authors:  Foteini Tsakoumaki; Charikleia Kyrkou; Maria Fotiou; Aristea Dimitropoulou; Costas G Biliaderis; Apostolos P Athanasiadis; Georgios Menexes; Alexandra-Maria Michaelidou
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 2.  The Mediterranean diet and nutritional adequacy: a review.

Authors:  Itandehui Castro-Quezada; Blanca Román-Viñas; Lluís Serra-Majem
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  A statistical method to base nutrient recommendations on meta-analysis of intake and health-related status biomarkers.

Authors:  Hilko van der Voet; Waldo J de Boer; Olga W Souverein; Esmée L Doets; Pieter van 't Veer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Estimating national and subnational nutrient intake distributions of global diets.

Authors:  Simone Passarelli; Christopher M Free; Lindsay H Allen; Carolina Batis; Ty Beal; Anja Pia Biltoft-Jensen; Sabri Bromage; Ling Cao; Analí Castellanos-Gutiérrez; Tue Christensen; Sandra P Crispim; Arnold Dekkers; Karin De Ridder; Selma Kronsteiner-Gicevic; Christopher Lee; Yanping Li; Mourad Moursi; Isabelle Moyersoen; Josef Schmidhuber; Alon Shepon; Daniel F Viana; Christopher D Golden
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 8.472

Review 5.  Nutrient intake values for folate during pregnancy and lactation vary widely around the world.

Authors:  Rosemary A Stamm; Lisa A Houghton
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.