Literature DB >> 17521116

Nutrient intake values (NIVs): a recommended terminology and framework for the derivation of values.

Janet C King1, Hester H Vorster, Daniel G Tome.   

Abstract

Although most countries and regions around the world set recommended nutrient intake values for their populations, there is no standardized terminology or framework for establishing these standards. Different terms used for various components of a set of dietary standards are described in this paper and a common set of terminology is proposed. The recommended terminology suggests that the set of values be called nutrient intake values (NIVs) and that the set be composed of three different values. The average nutrient requirement (ANR) reflects the median requirement for a nutrient in a specific population. The individual nutrient level (INLx) is the recommended level of nutrient intake for all healthy people in the population, which is set at a certain level x above the mean requirement. For example, a value set at 2 standard deviations above the mean requirement would cover the needs of 98% of the population and would be INL98. The third component of the NIVs is an upper nutrient level (UNL), which is the highest level of daily nutrient intake that is likely to pose no risk of adverse health effects for almost all individuals in a specified life-stage group. The proposed framework for deriving a set of NIVs is based on a statistical approach for determining the midpoint of a distribution of requirements for a set of nutrients in a population (the ANR), the standard deviation of the requirements, and an individual nutrient level that assures health at some point above the mean, e.g., 2 standard deviations. Ideally, a second set of distributions of risk of excessive intakes is used as the basis for a UNL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17521116     DOI: 10.1177/15648265070281S103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Nutr Bull        ISSN: 0379-5721            Impact factor:   2.069


  9 in total

1.  Current micronutrient recommendations in Europe: towards understanding their differences and similarities.

Authors:  Esmée L Doets; Liesbeth S de Wit; Rosalie A M Dhonukshe-Rutten; Adriënne E J M Cavelaars; Monique M Raats; Lada Timotijevic; Anna Brzozowska; Trudy M A Wijnhoven; Mirjana Pavlovic; Torunn Holm Totland; Lene F Andersen; Jiri Ruprich; Loek T J Pijls; Margaret Ashwell; Janet P Lambert; Pieter van 't Veer; Lisette C P G M de Groot
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Modelling of usual nutrient intakes: potential impact of the choices programme on nutrient intakes in young dutch adults.

Authors:  Annet J C Roodenburg; Adriana J van Ballegooijen; Mariska Dötsch-Klerk; Hilko van der Voet; Jacob C Seidell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  The Mediterranean diet and nutritional adequacy: a review.

Authors:  Itandehui Castro-Quezada; Blanca Román-Viñas; Lluís Serra-Majem
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  A statistical method to base nutrient recommendations on meta-analysis of intake and health-related status biomarkers.

Authors:  Hilko van der Voet; Waldo J de Boer; Olga W Souverein; Esmée L Doets; Pieter van 't Veer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Evidence-based approaches for establishing the 2015 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans.

Authors:  Sangah Shin; Subeen Kim; Hyojee Joung
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 1.926

Review 6.  Nutrient intake values for folate during pregnancy and lactation vary widely around the world.

Authors:  Rosemary A Stamm; Lisa A Houghton
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Dietary Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Analysis and Taxonomy.

Authors:  F Marijn Stok; Britta Renner; Julia Allan; Heiner Boeing; Regina Ensenauer; Sylvie Issanchou; Eva Kiesswetter; Nanna Lien; Mario Mazzocchi; Pablo Monsivais; Marta Stelmach-Mardas; Dorothee Volkert; Stefan Hoffmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-20

8.  The acceptance of zinc biofortified rice in Latin America: A consumer sensory study and grain quality characterization.

Authors:  Bo-Jane Woods; Sonia Gallego-Castillo; Elise F Talsma; Daniel Álvarez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Focus on the Possible Role of Dietary Sodium, Potassium, Phosphate, Magnesium, and Calcium on CKD Progression.

Authors:  Sandro Mazzaferro; Natalia de Martini; Jorge Cannata-Andía; Mario Cozzolino; Piergiorgio Messa; Silverio Rotondi; Lida Tartaglione; Marzia Pasquali
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.