BACKGROUND: Both tobacco and overweight present serious threats to public health. Although the military has targeted both health issues, only weight status is included in tests of fitness. This study contrasted the relative utility of body weight and smoking as markers for fitness for duty. METHODS: Using data from the 2002 Department of Defense Survey of Health-Related Behaviors among Military Personnel (N = 12,149; 24.7% female), troops were categorized according to weight (underweight, healthy weight, overweight, or obese) and smoking status (never smoker, former smoker, or current smoker). RESULTS: Logistic models were developed to examine the usefulness of smoking status and weight status as predictors of items assessing four domains of military fitness for duty, namely, physical health, mental health, substance abuse, and legal problems. Smoking status was a consistent and strong predictor of items within all four fitness domains. In contrast, weight status was not a consistent predictor of fitness. CONCLUSION: The military should consider adding smoking status to assessments of military fitness. Also, given that underweight and not overweight status predicted negative outcomes among military members, the services should consider revising their weight status fitness standards.
BACKGROUND: Both tobacco and overweight present serious threats to public health. Although the military has targeted both health issues, only weight status is included in tests of fitness. This study contrasted the relative utility of body weight and smoking as markers for fitness for duty. METHODS: Using data from the 2002 Department of Defense Survey of Health-Related Behaviors among Military Personnel (N = 12,149; 24.7% female), troops were categorized according to weight (underweight, healthy weight, overweight, or obese) and smoking status (never smoker, former smoker, or current smoker). RESULTS: Logistic models were developed to examine the usefulness of smoking status and weight status as predictors of items assessing four domains of military fitness for duty, namely, physical health, mental health, substance abuse, and legal problems. Smoking status was a consistent and strong predictor of items within all four fitness domains. In contrast, weight status was not a consistent predictor of fitness. CONCLUSION: The military should consider adding smoking status to assessments of military fitness. Also, given that underweight and not overweight status predicted negative outcomes among military members, the services should consider revising their weight status fitness standards.
Authors: Amanda Y Kong; Shelley D Golden; Allison E Myers; Melissa A Little; Robert Klesges; Wayne Talcott; Sara M Vandegrift; Daniel G Cassidy; Kurt M Ribisl Journal: Tob Control Date: 2018-04-28 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Walker S C Poston; Christopher K Haddock; Sara A Jahnke; Melissa L Hyder; Nattinee Jitnarin Journal: Mil Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Nattinee Jitnarin; Walker S C Poston; Christopher K Haddock; Sara A Jahnke; Rena S Day Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: C Keith Haddock; Nattinee Jitnarin; Walker S C Poston; Brianne Tuley; Sara A Jahnke Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Walker S C Poston; Richard R Suminski; Kevin M Hoffman; Nattinee Jitnarin; Joseph Hughey; Harry A Lando; Amelia Winsby; Keith Haddock Journal: Mil Med Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Christopher Keith Haddock; Melissa L Hyder; Walker S C Poston; Sara A Jahnke; Larry N Williams; Harry Lando Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Hesham I Al-Khashan; Fahad S Al Sabaan; Hifa S Al Nasser; Ahmed A Al Buraidi; Ahmed D Al Awad; Ghalib B Horaib; AlJoharah H Al Obaikan; Adel M Mishriky Journal: J Family Community Med Date: 2014-09