Vipul R Patel1. 1. Department of Robotic and Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Vipul.patel@osumc.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The application of robotic assisted technology has created a new era in surgery, by addressing some of the limitations of conventional open and laparoscopic surgery. To optimize success the incorporation of robotics into a surgical program must be performed with a structured approach. We discuss the key factors for building a successful robotic surgery program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prior to implementing a robotics program certain essential elements must be examined. One must assess the overall goals of the program, the initial applications of the technology and the time line for success. In addition a financial analysis of the potential impact of the technology must also be performed. Essential personnel should also be identified in order to form a cohesive robotic surgery team. These preparatory sets help coordinate the establishment of the program and help to prevent unrealistic expectations; while generating the best environment for success. RESULTS: Once the purchase of the robotic system has been approved a robotic surgery team is created with certain essential components. This staff includes: the surgeons, nursing staff, physician assistants, resident/fellows, program coordinator, marketing and a financial analysis team. This team will work together to achieve the common goals for the program. CONCLUSION: Robotic assisted surgery has grown tremendously over the last half decade in certain surgical fields such as urology. The success of programs has been variable and often related to the infrastructure of the program. The key factors appear to be creation of a sound financial plan, early identification of applicable specialties and a motivated surgical team. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
INTRODUCTION: The application of robotic assisted technology has created a new era in surgery, by addressing some of the limitations of conventional open and laparoscopic surgery. To optimize success the incorporation of robotics into a surgical program must be performed with a structured approach. We discuss the key factors for building a successful robotic surgery program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prior to implementing a robotics program certain essential elements must be examined. One must assess the overall goals of the program, the initial applications of the technology and the time line for success. In addition a financial analysis of the potential impact of the technology must also be performed. Essential personnel should also be identified in order to form a cohesive robotic surgery team. These preparatory sets help coordinate the establishment of the program and help to prevent unrealistic expectations; while generating the best environment for success. RESULTS: Once the purchase of the robotic system has been approved a robotic surgery team is created with certain essential components. This staff includes: the surgeons, nursing staff, physician assistants, resident/fellows, program coordinator, marketing and a financial analysis team. This team will work together to achieve the common goals for the program. CONCLUSION: Robotic assisted surgery has grown tremendously over the last half decade in certain surgical fields such as urology. The success of programs has been variable and often related to the infrastructure of the program. The key factors appear to be creation of a sound financial plan, early identification of applicable specialties and a motivated surgical team. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: F J J Fernandez-Nogueras; M J Katati; M A Arraez Sanchez; M Molina Martinez; M Sanchez Carrion Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Mathew D Sorensen; Michael H Johnson; Catherine Delostrinos; Jeff B Bice; Richard W Grady; Thomas S Lendvay Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Steven D Wexner; Roberto Bergamaschi; Antonio Lacy; Jonas Udo; Hans Brölmann; Robin H Kennedy; Hubert John Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 4.584