Literature DB >> 17519395

Neurotoxic mechanisms of electrophilic type-2 alkenes: soft soft interactions described by quantum mechanical parameters.

Richard M LoPachin1, Terrence Gavin, Brian C Geohagen, Soma Das.   

Abstract

Conjugated Type-2 alkenes, such as acrylamide (ACR), are soft electrophiles that produce neurotoxicity by forming adducts with soft nucleophilic sulfhydryl groups on proteins. Soft-soft interactions are governed by frontier molecular orbital characteristics and can be defined by quantum mechanical parameters such as softness (sigma) and chemical potential (mu). The neurotoxic potency of ACR is likely related to the rate of adduct formation, which is reflected in values of sigma. Correspondingly, differences in mu, the ability of a nucleophile to transfer electrons to an electrophile, could determine protein targets of these chemicals. Here, sigma and mu were calculated for a series of structurally similar Type-2 alkenes and their potential sulfhydryl targets. Results show that N-ethylmaleimide, acrolein and methylvinyl ketone were softer electrophiles than methyl acrylate or ACR. Softness (sigma) was closely correlated to corresponding second-order rate constants (k(2)) for electrophile reactions with sulfhydryl groups on N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). The rank order of softness was also directly related to neurotoxic potency as determined by impairment of synaptosomal function and sulfhydryl loss. Calculations of mu showed that the thiolate state of several cysteine analogs was the preferred nucleophilic target of alkene electrophiles. In addition, mu was directly related to the thiolate rate constant (k) for the reaction of the Type-2 alkenes with the cysteine compounds. Finally, in accordance with respective mu values, we found that NAC, but not N-acetyl-L-lysine, protected synaptosomes from toxicity. These findings suggest that the neurotoxicity of ACR and its conjugated alkene analogs is related to electrophilic softness and that the thiolate state of cysteine residues is the corresponding adduct target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17519395     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  36 in total

1.  Hydrogen sulfide anion regulates redox signaling via electrophile sulfhydration.

Authors:  Motohiro Nishida; Tomohiro Sawa; Naoyuki Kitajima; Katsuhiko Ono; Hirofumi Inoue; Hideshi Ihara; Hozumi Motohashi; Masayuki Yamamoto; Makoto Suematsu; Hitoshi Kurose; Albert van der Vliet; Bruce A Freeman; Takahiro Shibata; Koji Uchida; Yoshito Kumagai; Takaaki Akaike
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 2.  Detection of electrophile-sensitive proteins.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wall; M Ryan Smith; Karina Ricart; Fen Zhou; Praveen K Vayalil; Joo-Yeun Oh; Aimee Landar
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-09-08

3.  Quinone-induced protein handling changes: implications for major protein handling systems in quinone-mediated toxicity.

Authors:  Rui Xiong; David Siegel; David Ross
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  Formation and signaling actions of electrophilic lipids.

Authors:  Francisco J Schopfer; Chiara Cipollina; Bruce A Freeman
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  β-dicarbonyl enolates: a new class of neuroprotectants.

Authors:  Richard M LoPachin; Terrence Gavin; Brian C Geohagen; Lihai Zhang; Diana Casper; Rukmani Lekhraj; David S Barber
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 5.372

Review 6.  Application of the Hard and Soft, Acids and Bases (HSAB) theory to toxicant--target interactions.

Authors:  Richard M Lopachin; Terrence Gavin; Anthony Decaprio; David S Barber
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Application of the hard and soft, acids and bases (HSAB) theory as a method to predict cumulative neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Fjodor Melnikov; Brian C Geohagen; Terrence Gavin; Richard M LoPachin; Paul T Anastas; Phillip Coish; David W Herr
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.294

8.  Phloretin cytoprotection and toxicity.

Authors:  Brian C Geohagen; Boris Korsharskyy; Amaresh Vydyanatha; Lars Nordstroem; Richard M LoPachin
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.192

Review 9.  Molecular mechanisms of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and acrolein toxicity: nucleophilic targets and adduct formation.

Authors:  Richard M LoPachin; Terrence Gavin; Dennis R Petersen; David S Barber
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Synaptosomal toxicity and nucleophilic targets of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal.

Authors:  Richard M Lopachin; Brian C Geohagen; Terrence Gavin
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.