Literature DB >> 17518838

Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback?

Hazel K Sinclair1, Jennifer A Cleland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to monitor which undergraduate students collected formative feedback on their degree essays and to quantify any correlations between gender or summative mark achieved and whether formative feedback was sought.
METHODS: We carried out a study at the University of Aberdeen Medical School, involving a total of 360 Year 3 students, comprising all 177 students in the 2004 cohort and 183 in 2005. Data on gender and summative mark were routinely collected during the degree assessment processes in March 2004 and 2005. Students signed on receipt of their feedback.
RESULTS: Less than half the students (46%) collected their formative feedback: 47% in 2004, and 45% in 2005. Overall, females were significantly more likely than males to seek formative feedback (P = 0.004). Higher achievers were significantly more likely than lower achievers to seek their feedback (P = 0.020).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that these medical students, particularly males and poor students, may not use assessment feedback as a learning experience. Female and better students are keener to seek out formative feedback that might be expected to help them continue to do well. We need to explore further why so many students do not access formative feedback, and develop strategies for addressing this issue effectively.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17518838     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02768.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  16 in total

1.  Undergraduate Medical Students' Perceptions on Feedback-Seeking Behaviour.

Authors:  Dwita Oktaria; Diantha Soemantri
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-28

2.  When did they leave, and why? A retrospective case study of attrition on the Nottingham undergraduate medical course.

Authors:  Janet Yates
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Development of a 'toolkit' to identify medical students at risk of failure to thrive on the course: an exploratory retrospective case study.

Authors:  Janet Yates
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Delivery and use of individualised feedback in large class medical teaching.

Authors:  Steven A Burr; Elizabeth Brodier; Simon Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently).

Authors:  Jeffrey Schinske; Kimberly Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Supervised learning events in the foundation programme: a UK-wide narrative interview study.

Authors:  Charlotte E Rees; Jennifer A Cleland; Ashley Dennis; Narcie Kelly; Karen Mattick; Lynn V Monrouxe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Feedback using an ePortfolio for medicine long cases: quality not quantity.

Authors:  Jane Bleasel; Annette Burgess; Ruth Weeks; Inam Haq
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Explicit feedback to enhance the effect of an interim assessment: a cross-over study on learning effect and gender difference.

Authors:  Marleen Olde Bekkink; Rogier Donders; Goos N P van Muijen; Rob M W de Waal; Dirk J Ruiter
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2012-09-27

9.  The Effect of Applying Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) on Nursing Students' Clinical Skills: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Habibi Hengameh; Raiesifar Afsaneh; Khaghanizade Morteza; Mahmudi Hosein; Seyed Mazhari Marjan; Ebadi Abbas
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-03-26

10.  Factors influencing students' receptivity to formative feedback emerging from different assessment cultures.

Authors:  Christopher J Harrison; Karen D Könings; Elaine F Dannefer; Lambert W T Schuwirth; Valerie Wass; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.