Literature DB >> 17518833

Unannounced standardised patients in real practice: a systematic literature review.

Jan-Joost Rethans1, Simone Gorter, Lonneke Bokken, Linda Morrison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No attempt has been made to give a systematic overview of the innovative use of unannounced or incognito standardised patients.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a systematic overview of all published studies with incognito standardised patients assessing doctors in actual practice situations using sound reliable and valid standardised patient methodology.
METHODS: Systematic literature search in Medline, Eric and Psyclit with piloted search terms, followed by retrieving additional papers from reference lists. All papers were scored with a predefined protocol-sheet using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
RESULTS: Forty papers referring to 21 projects with incognito standardised patients were found and described in detail. The majority of studies were conducted in primary care and were descriptive. DISCUSSION: There is a need for research on the additional value of the incognito standardised patient methodology and for a consensus on how to report on accuracy and consistency of standardised patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17518833     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02689.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  32 in total

1.  [Clinical safety in primary care. The systemic approach (I)].

Authors:  Francesc Borrell Carrió
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 2.  The Benefits and Risks of Being a Standardized Patient: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joseph Plaksin; Joseph Nicholson; Sarita Kundrod; Sondra Zabar; Adina Kalet; Lisa Altshuler
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The know-do gap in quality of health care for childhood diarrhea and pneumonia in rural India.

Authors:  Manoj Mohanan; Marcos Vera-Hernández; Veena Das; Soledad Giardili; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Tracy L Rabin; Sunil S Raj; Jeremy I Schwartz; Aparna Seth
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 4.  The advantages and challenges of unannounced standardized patient methodology to assess healthcare communication.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Heather L Rogers; Allison C Waller; Sonja Harris-Haywood; Ronald M Esptein; Francesc Borrell Carrio; Gayle Gliva-McConvey; Daniel R Longo
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-03

5.  Effect of a peer-educational intervention on provider knowledge and reported performance in family planning services: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh Charandabi; Rezagoli Vahidi; Lena Marions; Rolf Wahlström
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 6.  In urban and rural India, a standardized patient study showed low levels of provider training and huge quality gaps.

Authors:  Jishnu Das; Alaka Holla; Veena Das; Manoj Mohanan; Diana Tabak; Brian Chan
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Unbiased review of digital diagnostic images in practice: informatics prototype and pilot study.

Authors:  Anthony F Fotenos; Nabile M Safdar; Paul G Nagy; Reuben Mezrich; Jonathan S Lewin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Comparative effectiveness of audit-feedback versus additional physician communication training to improve cancer screening for patients with limited health literacy.

Authors:  Eboni G Price-Haywood; Jewel Harden-Barrios; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Use of standardised patients to assess quality of tuberculosis care: a pilot, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jishnu Das; Ada Kwan; Benjamin Daniels; Srinath Satyanarayana; Ramnath Subbaraman; Sofi Bergkvist; Ranendra K Das; Veena Das; Madhukar Pai
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 25.071

10.  Quality of clinical aspects of call handling at Dutch out of hours centres: cross sectional national study.

Authors:  Hay P Derkx; Jan-Joost E Rethans; Arno M Muijtjens; Bas H Maiburg; Ron Winkens; Harrie G van Rooij; J André Knottnerus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.