Literature DB >> 17518728

Recent advances in gene delivery for structural bone allografts.

Hani A Awad1, Xinping Zhang, David G Reynolds, Robert E Guldberg, Regis J O'Keefe, Edward M Schwarz.   

Abstract

In this paper, we review the progress toward developing strategies to engineer improved structural grafting of bone. Three strategies are typically used to augment massive bone defect repair. The first is to engraft mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) onto a graft or a biosynthetic matrix to provide a viable osteoinductive scaffold material for segmental defect repair. The second strategy is to introduce critical factor(s), for example, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), in the form of bone-derived or recombinant proteins onto the graft or matrix directly. The third strategy uses targeted delivery of therapeutic genes (using viral and nonviral vectors) that either transduce host cells in vivo or stably transduce cells in vitro for subsequent implantation in vivo. We developed a murine femoral model in which allografts can be revitalized via recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) gene transfer. Specifically, allografts coated with rAAV expressing either the constitutively active BMP type I receptor Alk2 (caAlk2), or the angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) combined with the osteoclastogenic factor receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL) have remarkable osteogenic, angiogenic, and remodeling effects that have not been previously documented in healing allografts. Using histomorphometric and micro computed tomography (muCT) imaging we show that rAAV-mediated delivery of caAlk2 induces significant osteoinduction manifested by a mineralized callus on the surface of the allograft, which resembles the healing response of an autograft. We also demonstrate that the rAAV-mediated gene transfer of the combination of VEGF and RANKL can induce significant vascularization and remodeling of processed structural allografts. By contrast, rAAV-LacZ coated allograft controls appeared similar to necrotic allografts and lacked significant mineralized callus, neovascularization, and remodeling. Therefore, innovations in gene delivery offer promising therapeutic approaches for tissue engineering of structural bone substitutes that can potentially have clinical applications in challenging indications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17518728     DOI: 10.1089/ten.2006.0107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng        ISSN: 1076-3279


  21 in total

1.  Runx2 overexpression in bone marrow stromal cells accelerates bone formation in critical-sized femoral defects.

Authors:  Abigail M Wojtowicz; Kellie L Templeman; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg; Andrés J García
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Critical-size calvarial bone defects healing in a mouse model with silk scaffolds and SATB2-modified iPSCs.

Authors:  Jin-Hai Ye; Yuan-Jin Xu; Jun Gao; Shi-Guo Yan; Jun Zhao; Qisheng Tu; Jin Zhang; Xue-Jing Duan; Cesar A Sommer; Gustavo Mostoslavsky; David L Kaplan; Yu-Nong Wu; Chen-Ping Zhang; Lin Wang; Jake Chen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Quantification of massive allograft healing with dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI and cone beam-CT: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nicole Ehrhart; Susan Kraft; David Conover; Randy N Rosier; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The effect of mesenchymal stem cells delivered via hydrogel-based tissue engineered periosteum on bone allograft healing.

Authors:  Michael D Hoffman; Chao Xie; Xinping Zhang; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Direct gene therapy for bone regeneration: gene delivery, animal models, and outcome measures.

Authors:  Gadi Pelled; Ayelet Ben-Arav; Colleen Hock; David G Reynolds; Cemal Yazici; Yoram Zilberman; Zulma Gazit; Hani Awad; Dan Gazit; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 6.  Gene therapy approaches to regenerating bone.

Authors:  Nadav Kimelman Bleich; Ilan Kallai; Jay R Lieberman; Edward M Schwarz; Gadi Pelled; Dan Gazit
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  Emulating native periosteum cell population and subsequent paracrine factor production to promote tissue engineered periosteum-mediated allograft healing.

Authors:  Michael D Hoffman; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Self-complementary AAV2.5-BMP2-coated femoral allografts mediated superior bone healing versus live autografts in mice with equivalent biomechanics to unfractured femur.

Authors:  Cemal Yazici; Masahiko Takahata; David G Reynolds; Chao Xie; R Jude Samulski; Jade Samulski; E Jeffrey Beecham; Arthur A Gertzman; Mark Spilker; Xinping Zhang; Regis J O'Keefe; Hani A Awad; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 11.454

9.  In situ bone tissue engineering via ultrasound-mediated gene delivery to endogenous progenitor cells in mini-pigs.

Authors:  Maxim Bez; Dmitriy Sheyn; Wafa Tawackoli; Pablo Avalos; Galina Shapiro; Joseph C Giaconi; Xiaoyu Da; Shiran Ben David; Jayne Gavrity; Hani A Awad; Hyun W Bae; Eric J Ley; Thomas J Kremen; Zulma Gazit; Katherine W Ferrara; Gadi Pelled; Dan Gazit
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Coating of biomaterial scaffolds with the collagen-mimetic peptide GFOGER for bone defect repair.

Authors:  Abigail M Wojtowicz; Asha Shekaran; Megan E Oest; Kenneth M Dupont; Kellie L Templeman; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg; Andrés J García
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.