Literature DB >> 17517715

Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques.

C Grainger1, T Clarke, S M McGinn, M J Auldist, K A Beauchemin, M C Hannah, G C Waghorn, H Clark, R J Eckard.   

Abstract

Our study compared methane (CH4) emissions from lactating dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and open-circuit respiration chamber techniques. The study was conducted using 16 lactating Holstein-Friesian cows. In each chamber, the cow was fitted with the SF6 tracer apparatus to measure total CH4 emissions, including emissions from the rectum. Fresh ryegrass pasture was harvested daily and fed ad libitum to each cow with a supplement of 5 kg of grain/d. The CH4 emissions measured using the SF6 tracer technique were similar to those using the chamber technique: 331 vs. 322 g of CH4/d per cow. The accuracy of the SF6 tracer technique was indicated by considering the ratio of the CH4 emission measured using the SF6 tracer to the emission measured using the chamber for each cow on each day. The calculated ratio of 102.3% (SE = 1.51) was not different from 100%. A higher variability within cow between days was found for the SF6 tracer technique [coefficient of variation (CV) = 6.1%] than for the chamber technique (CV = 4.3%). The variability among cows was substantially higher than within cows, and was higher for the SF6 technique (CV = 19.6%) than for the chamber technique (CV = 17.8%). Our CH4 emission data were compared with whole-animal chamber studies conducted in Canada and Ireland. In the Canadian study the SF6 technique did not measure CH4 emissions from the rectum and emissions were 8% lower than those measured using the chamber, indicating that emissions from the rectum may be greater than previously measured (1%). The relationship between CH4 emission and dry matter intake was examined for our data and for that reported in the Canadian study. There was a difference in the slopes of the regressions derived from our data and that from Canada; 17.1 vs. 20.8 g of CH4/kg of dry matter intake. A difference between the 2 locations was expected based on the difference in diet composition for these 2 studies. The SF6 tracer technique is reasonably accurate for inventory purposes and for evaluating the effects of mitigation strategies on CH4 emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17517715     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2006-697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  19 in total

1.  Heritability of methane emissions from dairy cows over a lactation measured on commercial farms.

Authors:  M Pszczola; K Rzewuska; S Mucha; T Strabel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Measurement and prediction of enteric methane emission.

Authors:  Veerasamy Sejian; Rattan Lal; Jeffrey Lakritz; Thaddeus Ezeji
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Diversity of rumen microbiota using metagenome sequencing and methane yield in Indian sheep fed on straw and concentrate diet.

Authors:  P K Malik; S Trivedi; A P Kolte; V Sejian; R Bhatta; H Rahman
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Comparison of 3 methods for estimating enteric methane and carbon dioxide emission in nonlactating cows.

Authors:  M Doreau; M Arbre; Y Rochette; C Lascoux; M Eugène; C Martin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Metagenomic predictions: from microbiome to complex health and environmental phenotypes in humans and cattle.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ross; Peter J Moate; Leah C Marett; Ben G Cocks; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Methods for Measuring and Estimating Methane Emission from Ruminants.

Authors:  Ida M L D Storm; Anne Louise F Hellwing; Nicolaj I Nielsen; Jørgen Madsen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Extending the Collection Duration of Breath Samples for Enteric Methane Emission Estimation Using the SF₆ Tracer Technique.

Authors:  César Pinares-Patiño; José Gere; Karen Williams; Roberto Gratton; Paula Juliarena; German Molano; Sarah MacLean; Edgar Sandoval; Grant Taylor; John Koolaard
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome.

Authors:  Weibing Shi; Christina D Moon; Sinead C Leahy; Dongwan Kang; Jeff Froula; Sandra Kittelmann; Christina Fan; Samuel Deutsch; Dragana Gagic; Henning Seedorf; William J Kelly; Renee Atua; Carrie Sang; Priya Soni; Dong Li; Cesar S Pinares-Patiño; John C McEwan; Peter H Janssen; Feng Chen; Axel Visel; Zhong Wang; Graeme T Attwood; Edward M Rubin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production.

Authors:  J A Basarab; K A Beauchemin; V S Baron; K H Ominski; L L Guan; S P Miller; J J Crowley
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Individual variation and repeatability of methane production from dairy cows estimated by the CO₂ method in automatic milking system.

Authors:  M N Haque; C Cornou; J Madsen
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.