Literature DB >> 17517236

A standard for assessing the risks of pediatric research: pro and con.

David Wendler1, Leonard Glantz.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17517236      PMCID： PMC2062570          DOI： 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN： 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Optimistic biases about personal risks.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk.

Authors:  D B Resnik
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard: implications for pediatric research without a prospect of direct benefit.

Authors:  David Wendler; Leah Belsky; Kimberly M Thompson; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The enforcement of morals: nontherapeutic research on children.

Authors:  P Ramsey
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  Experimentation in children: sharing in sociality.

Authors:  R A McCormick
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Children as research subjects: a reply.

Authors:  P Ramsey
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  Proxy consent in the experimentation situation.

Authors:  R A McCormick
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.416

9.  Nontherapeutic research procedures involving children with cancer.

Authors:  T F Ackerman
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 10.  Minimal risk as an international ethical standard in research.

Authors:  Loretta M Kopelman
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2004-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  Is it possible to protect pediatric research subjects without blocking appropriate research?

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  What we worry about when we worry about the ethics of clinical research.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2011-06

3.  Views of adolescents and parents on pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.

Authors:  David Wendler; Emily Abdoler; Lori Wiener; Christine Grady
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Use of deferred consent for severely ill children in a multi-centre phase III trial.

Authors:  Kathryn Maitland; Sassy Molyneux; Mwamvua Boga; Sarah Kiguli; Trudie Lang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  "It Can Be Hard But It's Not Bad": Three Questions to Solicit Caregiver Perceptions of Benefits and Burdens to Participating in Pediatric Palliative Care Research.

Authors:  Cheryl Reggio; Catriona Mowbray; Mia K Waldron; Adelaide L Rood; Gabriella Sibilia; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  A Defense of The-Risks-of-Daily-Life.

Authors:  Ariella Binik
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2017
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.