Literature DB >> 17517019

Improbable or impossible? How children reason about the possibility of extraordinary events.

Andrew Shtulman1, Susan Carey.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the development of possibility-judgment strategies between the ages of 4 and 8. In Experiment 1, 48 children and 16 adults were asked whether a variety of extraordinary events could or could not occur in real life. Although children of all ages denied the possibility of events that adults also judged impossible, children frequently denied the possibility of events that adults judged improbable but not impossible. Three additional experiments varied the manner in which possibility judgments were elicited and confirmed the robustness of preschoolers' tendency to judge improbable events impossible. Overall, it is argued that children initially mistake their inability to imagine circumstances that would allow an event to occur for evidence that no such circumstances exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17517019     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01047.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  27 in total

1.  Reasoning about knowledge: Children's evaluations of generality and verifiability.

Authors:  Melissa A Koenig; Caitlin A Cole; Meredith Meyer; Katherine E Ridge; Tamar Kushnir; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Confronting, Representing, and Believing Counterintuitive Concepts: Navigating the Natural and the Supernatural.

Authors:  Jonathan D Lane; Paul L Harris
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-03

3.  Approaching an understanding of omniscience from the preschool years to early adulthood.

Authors:  Jonathan D Lane; Henry M Wellman; E Margaret Evans
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2014-08-25

4.  Interactions Between Knowledge and Testimony in Children's Reality-Status Judgments.

Authors:  Gabriel Lopez-Mobilia; Jacqueline D Woolley
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2016-01-11

5.  A bump on a bump? Emerging intuitions concerning the relative difficulty of the sciences.

Authors:  Frank C Keil; Kristi L Lockhart; Esther Schlegel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-02

6.  The Effect of Realistic Contexts on Ontological Judgments of Novel Entities.

Authors:  Jennifer Van Reet; Ashley M Pinkham; Angeline S Lillard
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

7.  Morality constrains the default representation of what is possible.

Authors:  Jonathan Phillips; Fiery Cushman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The development of children's ability to use evidence to infer reality status.

Authors:  Ansley Tullos; Jacqueline D Woolley
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

Review 9.  Revisiting the fantasy-reality distinction: children as naïve skeptics.

Authors:  Jacqueline D Woolley; Maliki E Ghossainy
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-03-15

10.  Cognitive parallels between moral judgment and modal judgment.

Authors:  Andrew Shtulman; Lester Tong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.