Literature DB >> 17516801

Eye-mouth-eye angle as a good indicator of face masculinization, asymmetry, and attractiveness (Homo sapiens).

Dariusz Danel1, Boguslaw Pawlowski.   

Abstract

Past research on male facial attractiveness has been limited by the reliance on facialmetric measures that are less than ideal. In particular, some of these measures are face size dependent and show only weak sexual dimorphism, which limits the ability to identify the relationship between masculinization and attractiveness. Here, the authors show that eye-mouth-eye (EME) angle is a quantitative and face size independent trait that is sexually dimorphic and a good indicator of masculinity and face symmetry. Using frontal photographs of female and male faces, the authors first confirmed that the EME angle (measured with the vertex in the middle of the mouth and the arms crossing the centers of pupils) was highly sexually dimorphic. Then, using pictures of young male faces whose attractiveness was assessed on a 7-point scale by young women, the authors showed that attractiveness rate was negatively correlated with EME angle and with the angle asymmetry. The results are compared with those that could be obtained with interpupilary or upper face height measurements. The authors discuss the relationship between attractiveness and both EME angle and its symmetry in the light of evolutionary psychology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17516801     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.2.221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  6 in total

1.  New "golden" ratios for facial beauty.

Authors:  Pamela M Pallett; Stephen Link; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Facing aggression: cues differ for female versus male faces.

Authors:  Shawn N Geniole; Amanda E Keyes; Catherine J Mondloch; Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Facial masculinity: how the choice of measurement method enables to detect its influence on behaviour.

Authors:  Santiago Sanchez-Pages; Claudia Rodriguez-Ruiz; Enrique Turiegano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Art or Science? An Evidence-Based Approach to Human Facial Beauty a Quantitative Analysis Towards an Informed Clinical Aesthetic Practice.

Authors:  Harpal Harrar; Simon Myers; Ali M Ghanem
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  In your face: facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players.

Authors:  Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Chen's Double Eyelid Fold Ratio.

Authors:  Chen-Chia Chen; Hao-Chih Tai; Chien-Lin Huang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-04-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.