Literature DB >> 17516721

Medical outcomes of glaucoma therapy from a nationwide representative survey.

Philippe Denis1, Antoine Lafuma, Gilles Berdeaux.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the medical outcomes of patients treated for primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight ophthalmologists selected at random from a national professional list in France were asked to report on disease progression in consecutive patients who they saw in their clinics and who had either POAG, normal tension glaucoma/ocular hypertension, and who were aged >18 years of age. Data on sociodemographics, general and ocular comorbidities, glaucoma risk factors, visual acuity (VA), optic nerve head (ONH) clinical data, and visual fields were collected. Disease progression was defined as a deterioration of ONH and/or visual field since initial diagnosis. Changes in treatment were also monitored. A treatment change was defined as adding a new drug or changing any of the current treatments. Time to treatment failure was compared using the Wilcoxon test applied to survival curves.
RESULTS: Of 127 patients who were evaluated, 12 developed a disease progression after diagnosis (average follow-up 2.4 years). No statistically significant difference in the known confounding factors of disease progression was found between patients with or without disease progression. At 32 months, 2.6% of the patients with no changes in treatment had a DP, compared with 22.6% with one change in treatment and 46.2% with two or more changes in treatment (p < 0.03). Patients who experienced adverse effects (p < 0.008) and those who said they were unhappy with their treatment (p < 0.03) more often experienced disease progression.
CONCLUSION: An estimated 9.4% of a representative sample of patients with POAG or ocular hypertension experienced disease progression within 2.5 years of initial diagnosis. Patients with disease progression had more changes in treatment and adverse events; they were also more likely to have complained about being unhappy with their treatment.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 17516721     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200424060-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  23 in total

1.  Costs of medical and surgical treatment of glaucoma.

Authors:  B M Calissendorff
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2001-06

2.  Resource use and costs of patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a one-year study based on retrospective chart review in the Netherlands.

Authors:  J B Oostenbrink; M P Rutten-van Mölken; T S Sluyter-Opdenoordt
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Costs of treating primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a retrospective, observational two-year chart review of newly diagnosed patients in Sweden and the United States.

Authors:  G Kobelt-Nguyen; U G Gerdtham; A Alm
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Ocular hypertension--a long-term follow-up of treated and untreated patients.

Authors:  R David; D G Livingston; M H Luntz
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Correlation of pattern discrimination perimetry to the optic disc and visual field in ocular hypertensive and chronic open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  W C Stewart; A B Connor; G M Rogers
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael A Kass; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

7.  Direct costs of glaucoma management following initiation of medical therapy. A simulation model based on an observational study of glaucoma treatment in Germany.

Authors:  G Kobelt; L Jönsson; U Gerdtham; G K Krieglstein
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial.

Authors:  Anders Heijl; M Cristina Leske; Bo Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; Boel Bengtsson; Mohamed Hussein
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10

9.  A long-term clinical trial of timolol therapy versus no treatment in the management of glaucoma suspects.

Authors:  D L Epstein; J H Krug; E Hertzmark; L L Remis; D J Edelstein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  The treatment of newly diagnosed patients with glaucoma or with ocular hypertension in The Netherlands: an observational study of costs and initial treatment success based on retrospective chart review.

Authors:  J B Oostenbrink; M P Rutten-van Mölken; T S Opdenoordt
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of diurnal intraocular pressure control by latanoprost versus travoprost : results of an observational survey.

Authors:  Philippe Denis; Robert Launois; Marion Devaux; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Assessment of the cost effectiveness of travoprost versus latanoprost as single agents for treatment of glaucoma in France.

Authors:  Stéphanie Payet; Philippe Denis; Gilles Berdeaux; Robert Launois
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  The Prevalence of Demodex Blepharitis in US Eye Care Clinic Patients as Determined by Collarettes: A Pathognomonic Sign.

Authors:  William Trattler; Paul Karpecki; Yuna Rapoport; Ehsan Sadri; Scott Schachter; Walter O Whitley; Elizabeth Yeu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-15

4.  Development of the conceptual framework for the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ) in glaucoma using a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Nordmann; Philippe Denis; Marc Vigneux; Elyse Trudeau; Isabelle Guillemin; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.