Literature DB >> 17516150

Basis for a functional capacity evaluation methodology for patients with work-related neck disorders.

David D Reesink1, Wim Jorritsma, Michiel F Reneman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint and a relationship with reduced work-related functional capacity is assumed. A validated instrument to test functional capacity of patients with neck pain is unavailable. The objective of this study was to develop a Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE), which is content valid for determining functional capacity in patients with work related neck disorders (WRND).
METHODS: A review of epidemiological review literature was conducted to identify physical risk factors for WRND.
RESULTS: Evidence was found that physical risk factors contribute in development of WRND. Physical risk factors were related to repetitive movements, forceful movements, awkward positions and static contractions of the neck or the neck/shoulder region. An FCE was designed based on the risk factors identified. Eight tests were selected to cover all risk factors: repetitive side reaching, repetitive reaching overhead, static overhead work, front carry, forward static bend neck, overhead lift and the neck strength test. Content validity of this FCE was established by providing the rationale, specific objectives and operational definitions of the FCE.
CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to establish reliability and other aspects of validity of the neck-FCE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17516150     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-007-9086-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  58 in total

Review 1.  Physical risk factors for neck pain.

Authors:  G A Ariëns; W van Mechelen; P M Bongers; L M Bouter; G van der Wal
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 2.  Review of the factors associated with musculoskeletal problems in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  J Malchaire; N Cock; S Vergracht
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Shoulder muscle tenderness and physical features of female industrial workers.

Authors:  N Onishi; H Nomura; K Sakai; T Yamamoto; K Hirayama; T Itani
Journal:  J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)       Date:  1976-12

4.  Validity of work-related assessments.

Authors:  Ev Innes; Leon Straker
Journal:  Work       Date:  1999

Review 5.  Hard work never hurt anyone--or did it? A review of occupational associations with soft tissue musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limb.

Authors:  K Walker-Bone; C Cooper
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Test-retest reliability of a WRULD functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults.

Authors:  R Soer; E H J Gerrits; M F Reneman
Journal:  Work       Date:  2006

7.  Dutch monitor on stress and physical load: risk factors, consequences, and preventive action.

Authors:  I L Houtman; A Goudswaard; S Dhondt; M P van der Grinten; V H Hildebrandt; E G van der Poel
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Reduced mobility in the cervico-thoracic motion segment--a risk factor for musculoskeletal neck-shoulder pain: a two-year prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  S Norlander; B A Gustavsson; J Lindell; B Nordgren
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1997-09

9.  Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk factors for neck pain? Results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  G A Ariëns; P M Bongers; M Douwes; M C Miedema; W E Hoogendoorn; G van der Wal; L M Bouter; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Reliability of hand-held dynamometry and its relationship with manual muscle testing in patients with osteoarthritis in the knee.

Authors:  K W Hayes; J Falconer
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  6 in total

1.  Health professional's perceptions and practices in relation to functional capacity evaluations: results of a quantitative survey.

Authors:  Carole James; Lynette Mackenzie
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-04-14

2.  Experts opinion on the use of normative data for functional capacity evaluation in occupational and rehabilitation medicine and disability claims.

Authors:  Remko Soer; Michiel F Reneman; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; P Paul Kuijer; P Paul F M Kuijer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-12

3.  Relationship between self-reported disability and functional capacity in patients with whiplash associated disorder.

Authors:  Suzan van der Meer; Michiel F Reneman; Jan Verhoeven; Job van der Palen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-09

4.  Calling on the Client's Perceptions About the Contributions of Physiotherapists Working in Occupational Health Services.

Authors:  Laran Chetty
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2019-02-22

5.  Systematic review of the measurement properties of performance-based functional tests in patients with neck disorders.

Authors:  Steven McGee; Taylor Sipos; Thomas Allin; Celia Chen; Alexandra Greco; Pavlos Bobos; Joy MacDermid
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Reliability and safety of functional capacity evaluation in patients with whiplash associated disorders.

Authors:  M A Trippolini; M F Reneman; B Jansen; P U Dijkstra; J H B Geertzen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.