Literature DB >> 17516148

Seeking perfection: a Kantian look at human genetic engineering.

Martin Gunderson1.   

Abstract

It is tempting to argue that Kantian moral philosophy justifies prohibiting both human germ-line genetic engineering and non-therapeutic genetic engineering because they fail to respect human dignity. There are, however, good reasons for resisting this temptation. In fact, Kant's moral philosophy provides reasons that support genetic engineering-even germ-line and non-therapeutic. This is true of Kant's imperfect duties to seek one's own perfection and the happiness of others. It is also true of the categorical imperative. Kant's moral philosophy does, however, provide limits to justifiable genetic engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17516148     DOI: 10.1007/s11017-007-9030-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  5 in total

1.  Germ-line gene therapy and the medical imperative.

Authors:  Ronald Munson; Lawrence H Davis
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1992-06

2.  Beyond abortion: human genetics and the new eugenics.

Authors:  John R Harding
Journal:  Pepperdine Law Rev       Date:  1991

3.  Germ-line genetic enhancement and Rawlsian primary goods.

Authors:  Fritz Allhoff
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2005-03

4.  Stem cells, biotechnology, and human rights: implications for a posthuman future.

Authors:  Paul Lauritzen
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Ethical issues in manipulating the human germ line.

Authors:  M Lappé
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1991-12
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Could Genetic Enhancement Really Lead to Obsolescence?

Authors:  Peter Zuk; Kristin M Kostick; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 11.229

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.