Literature DB >> 17515940

Exploring general practitioner identification and management of psychosocial Yellow Flags in acute low back pain.

Cameron Crawford1, Kathleen Ryan, Edward Shipton.   

Abstract

AIM: Over the past decade, psychosocial issues have been increasingly identified as risk factors that are associated with the development of chronicity and disability. These psychosocial risk factors are known as Yellow Flags. In New Zealand, in 1997, the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) published the Acute Low Back Pain Guide and the Guide to Assessing Psychosocial Yellow Flags in Acute Low Back Pain. The aim of this qualitative study is to understand the experiences of general practitioners (GPs) in the identification and management of psychosocial Yellow Flags in patients with acute low back pain.
METHOD: A qualitative research approach was used. GPs were purposively selected and semi-structured interviews were undertaken.
RESULTS: The doctor-patient relationship created the key element for the GPs in approaching any psychosocial factors that were identified. The management of psychosocial factors depended on an individual GP's worldview and orientation to the biopsychosocial model of pain. Problems with time management were composed of multifactorial facets. Funding, lack of appropriate training, and the GPs' perception of ACC's rehabilitation model, all formed components of the meanings that the GPs constructed from their experiences.
CONCLUSION: GPs did not use the Guide to Assessing Psychosocial Yellow Flags in Acute Low Back Pain or the screening questionnaire to identify psychosocial risk factors in their patients with low back pain. Investment of resources in GPs is needed to empower them to be effective gatekeepers guarding against chronicity. This demonstrates a need to alter the current ACC Guideline dissemination and implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17515940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  7 in total

1.  Acute low back pain management in general practice: uncertainty and conflicting certainties.

Authors:  Ben Darlow; Sarah Dean; Meredith Perry; Fiona Mathieson; G David Baxter; Anthony Dowell
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Yellow flag scores in a compensable New Zealand cohort suffering acute low back pain.

Authors:  Karen Grimmer-Somers; Mathew Prior; Jim Robertson
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Primary care physicians' attitudes and beliefs towards chronic low back pain: an Asian study.

Authors:  Regina W S Sit; Benjamin H K Yip; Dicken C C Chan; Samuel Y S Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Low-back pain at the emergency department: still not being managed?

Authors:  Alessandro Rizzardo; Luca Miceli; Rym Bednarova; Giovanni Maria Guadagnin; Rodolfo Sbrojavacca; Giorgio Della Rocca
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 5.  Etiology, Evaluation, and Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Marie-José Lahoud; Maroun Rizkallah; Gaby Kreichati; Khalil Kharrat
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-06-04

6.  Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based recommendations for low back pain in clinical practice: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Authors:  Amanda M Hall; Samantha R Scurrey; Andrea E Pike; Charlotte Albury; Helen L Richmond; James Matthews; Elaine Toomey; Jill A Hayden; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Physicians Working in Saudi Arabia Regarding the Management of Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ahmed S Alhowimel; Mazyad A Alotaibi; Dalyah M Alamam; Faris A Alodaibi; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-12-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.