STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted of all patients referred for an initial visit to the orthopedic outpatient clinic of a metropolitan pediatric hospital in Canada for suspected adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVE: To document the appropriateness of current referral patterns for AIS in comparison to those that were prevailing before discontinuation of school screening in Canada. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The consequences of the discontinuation of school scoliosis screening programs on the referral patterns of AIS patients remain unknown. METHODS: The clinical and radiologic charts of the 636 consecutive patients referred for scoliosis evaluation over a 1-year period were reviewed. Patients were classified according to defined criteria of appropriateness of referral based on skeletal maturity and curve magnitude. RESULTS: Of the 489 suspected cases of AIS, 206 (42%) had no significant deformity (Cobb angle <10 degrees ) and could be considered as inappropriate referrals. In subjects with confirmed AIS, 91 patients (32%) were classified as late referrals with regards to brace treatment indications. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that current referral mechanisms for AIS are leading to a suboptimal case-mix in orthopedics in terms of appropriateness of referral.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted of all patients referred for an initial visit to the orthopedic outpatient clinic of a metropolitan pediatric hospital in Canada for suspected adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVE: To document the appropriateness of current referral patterns for AIS in comparison to those that were prevailing before discontinuation of school screening in Canada. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The consequences of the discontinuation of school scoliosis screening programs on the referral patterns of AISpatients remain unknown. METHODS: The clinical and radiologic charts of the 636 consecutive patients referred for scoliosis evaluation over a 1-year period were reviewed. Patients were classified according to defined criteria of appropriateness of referral based on skeletal maturity and curve magnitude. RESULTS: Of the 489 suspected cases of AIS, 206 (42%) had no significant deformity (Cobb angle <10 degrees ) and could be considered as inappropriate referrals. In subjects with confirmed AIS, 91 patients (32%) were classified as late referrals with regards to brace treatment indications. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that current referral mechanisms for AIS are leading to a suboptimal case-mix in orthopedics in terms of appropriateness of referral.
Authors: Wei Wei Jiang; Connie Lok Kan Cheng; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Kelly Ka Lee Lai; Michael Kai Tsun To; Yong Ping Zheng Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Theodoros B Grivas; Marian H Wade; Stefano Negrini; Joseph P O'Brien; Toru Maruyama; Martha C Hawes; Manuel Rigo; Hans Rudolf Weiss; Tomasz Kotwicki; Elias S Vasiliadis; Lior Neuhaus Sulam; Tamar Neuhous Journal: Scoliosis Date: 2007-11-26
Authors: Debbie Ehrmann Feldman; Marie Beauséjour; Roxane Borgès Da Silva; Mamadou Diop; Hubert Labelle; Lise Goulet Journal: Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Date: 2014-09-22
Authors: Raphael Dziwornu Adobor; Rolf Bjarne Riise; Roger Sørensen; Thomas Johan Kibsgård; Harald Steen; Jens Ivar Brox Journal: Scoliosis Date: 2012-10-25
Authors: Marie Beauséjour; Lise Goulet; Debbie Ehrmann Feldman; Roxane Borgès Da Silva; Raynald Pineault; Michel Rossignol; Marjolaine Roy-Beaudry; Hubert Labelle Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-11-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jean Théroux; Norman Stomski; Stanley Innes; Ariane Ballard; Christelle Khadra; Hubert Labelle; Sylvie Le May Journal: Scoliosis Spinal Disord Date: 2017-07-17