Literature DB >> 17514887

Regeneration of standardized mandibular bone defects using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and various bone fillers.

Yasushi Nakajima1, Joseph P Fiorellini, David M Kim, Hans P Weber.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the new bone formation and biodegradability of various bone fillers placed underneath a nonresorbable membrane (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene [e-PTFE]) in standardized defects in a beagle dog model. Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six adult female beagle dogs. Three months after the extractions, six rectangular defects (4 mm apicocoronally, 7 mm mesiodistally, and the entire width of the ridge buccolingually) were surgically created in the alveolar processes. All defects were covered with an e-PTFE membrane and stabilized buccally with stainless steel fixation screws. Five different bone fillers were placed under the membranes in a random configuration in each dog: autogenous bone, demineralized freeze-dried bone, anorganic bovine bone, tricalcium phosphate granules, and collagen sponge. One site in each animal was treated with the e-PTFE membrane alone. Following an 8-month healing period, a bone core was harvested from each grafted site using a trephine drill. Samples from each of the grafted sites were evaluated histologically and histometrically for their bone regenerative potential. The result of this study demonstrated a positive effect of bone fillers on bone regeneration when combined with a nonresorbable membrane; however, no significant differences were found between the various bone fillers in terms of their regenerative potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17514887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

Review 1.  Natural graft tissues and synthetic biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive applications: a review.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Nader Hamdan; Yuichi Ikeda; Marc Grynpas; Bernhard Ganss; Michael Glogauer
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2017-06-05

2.  Physicochemical Characterization of Five Different Bone Graft Substitutes Used in Periodontal Regeneration: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Aiswarya Anil; Arun Sadasivan; Elizabeth Koshi
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2020-09-28

3.  Evaluating the bone-regenerative role of the decellularized porcine bone xenograft in a canine extraction socket model.

Authors:  Yuan-Wu Chen; Meng-Yen Chen; Dar-Jen Hsieh; Srinivasan Periasamy; Ko-Chung Yen; Chao-Tang Chuang; Hung-Chou Wang; Fan-Wei Tseng; Jer-Cheng Kuo; Hua-Hong Chien
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 4.  Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments.

Authors:  Rusin Zhao; Ruijia Yang; Paul R Cooper; Zohaib Khurshid; Amin Shavandi; Jithendra Ratnayake
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  Biomaterials for periodontal regeneration: a review of ceramics and polymers.

Authors:  Li Shue; Zhang Yufeng; Ullas Mony
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.