Literature DB >> 17514668

Multicentre randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colonic resection.

B Jung1, L Påhlman, P-O Nyström, E Nilsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that MBP does not lower the risk of postoperative septic complications after elective colorectal surgery. This randomized clinical trial assessed whether preoperative MBP is beneficial in elective colonic surgery.
METHODS: A total of 1505 patients, aged 18-85 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I-III, were randomized to MBP or no MBP before open elective surgery for cancer, adenoma or diverticular disease of the colon. Primary endpoints were cardiovascular, general infectious and surgical-site complications within 30 days, and secondary endpoints were death and reoperations within 30 days.
RESULTS: A total of 1343 patients were evaluated, 686 randomized to MBP and 657 to no MBP. There were no significant differences in overall complications between the two groups: cardiovascular complications occurred in 5.1 and 4.6 per cent respectively, general infectious complications in 7.9 and 6.8 per cent, and surgical-site complications in 15.1 and 16.1 per cent. At least one complication was recorded in 24.5 per cent of patients who had MBP and 23.7 per cent who did not.
CONCLUSION: MBP does not lower the complication rate and can be omitted before elective colonic resection. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN28535118 (http://www.controlled-trials.com). (c) 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17514668     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  50 in total

1.  A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A Rawlinson; P Kang; J Evans; A Khanna
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Cao; J Li; F Li
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Bowel preparation may be an important adjunct to ERAS in rectal surgery.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pappalardo; Saverio Coiro
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Bowel preparation: current status.

Authors:  James E Duncan; Christie M Quietmeyer
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

5.  Laparoscopic colon resection: To prep or not to prep? Analysis of 1535 patients.

Authors:  Marco Ettore Allaix; Simone Arolfo; Maurizio Degiuli; Giuseppe Giraudo; Silvio Volpatto; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Analysis of 230 cases of emergent surgery for obstructing colon cancer--lessons learned.

Authors:  Ahmet Kessaf Aslar; Süleyman Ozdemir; Hatim Mahmoudi; Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Preoperative bowel preparation for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a clinical practice guideline endorsed by the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

Authors:  Cagla Eskicioglu; Shawn S Forbes; Darlene S Fenech; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults.

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Mechanical bowel preparation does not affect the intramucosal bacterial colony count.

Authors:  Bärbel Jung; Peter Matthiessen; Kenneth Smedh; Erik Nilsson; Ulrika Ransjö; Lars Påhlman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Trends in demographics and management of obstructing colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Zaheer Moolla; Thandinkosi E Madiba
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.