Literature DB >> 1751464

Ofloxacin compared with chloramphenicol in the management of external ocular infection.

A J Bron1, G Leber, S N Rizk, H Baig, A R Elkington, G R Kirkby, C Neoh, A Harden, T Leong.   

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of 0.3% ofloxacin in treating bacterial ocular infections was compared with that of 0.5% chloramphenicol in a parallel-group, randomised clinical trial at five sites. Clinical and microbiological improvement rates were studied in 84 culture-positive patients. Patients with suspected bacterial ocular infections were evaluated for clinical improvement and were included in drug safety and comfort analyses. Clinical improvement did not differ significantly between drug treatments. All patients completing the study (79 assigned ofloxacin, and 74 chloramphenicol) showed clinical improvement. Clinical improvement in the culture-positive groups was 100% (41/41) after ofloxacin treatment, and 95% (41/43) after chloramphenicol treatment. Microbiological improvement rates were similar for the two drugs: 85% (33/39) improved with ofloxacin, and 88% (38/43) improved with chloramphenicol. Both drugs were well tolerated. Adverse reactions possibly due to the study medication occurred in 1% (1/89) of those who received ofloxacin, and in 4% (4/93) of those who received chloramphenicol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1751464      PMCID: PMC1042527          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.75.11.675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  36 in total

Review 1.  Chloramphenicol: new perspectives on an old drug.

Authors:  D A Powell; M C Nahata
Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm       Date:  1982-04

2.  Multiply resistant pneumococcus causing meningitis: its epidemiology within a day-care centre.

Authors:  M S Radetsky; G R Istre; T L Johansen; S W Parmelee; B A Lauer; A M Wiesenthal; M P Glode
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-10-10       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Chloramphenicol: what we have learned in the last decade.

Authors:  H M Feder
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 0.954

4.  Acute bacterial infections of the eye: their aetiology and treatment.

Authors:  V M Mahajan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Antibacterial activity of ofloxacin and other 4-quinolone derivatives: in-vitro and in-vivo comparison.

Authors:  J F Chantot; A Bryskier
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  In-vitro activity of ofloxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid compared to other quinolones and other antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  T Kumada; H C Neu
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Characterization of chloramphenicol-resistant Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  M C Roberts; C D Swenson; L M Owens; A L Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Meningitis due to Haemophilus influenzae type b resistant to both ampicillin and chloramphenicol.

Authors:  J F Kenny; C D Isburg; R H Michaels
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Ofloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  J P Monk; D M Campoli-Richards
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  The sensitivity of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria to ofloxacin.

Authors:  A Speciale; S Stefani; F Caccamo; V M Nicolosi; G Nicoletti
Journal:  Drugs Exp Clin Res       Date:  1987
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for chronic blepharitis.

Authors:  Kristina Lindsley; Sueko Matsumura; Elham Hatef; Esen K Akpek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

Review 2.  Treatment of ocular infections with topical antibacterials.

Authors:  J P Leeming
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Ocular penetration of topical ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin drops and their effect upon eyelid flora.

Authors:  J P Leeming; J P Diamond; R Trigg; L White; H B Hoh; D L Easty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Penetration of topically applied levofloxacin 0.5% and ofloxacin 0.3% into the vitreous of the non-inflamed human eye.

Authors:  Tuomo Puustjärvi; Markku Teräsvirta; Pila Nurmenniemi; Jukka Lokkila; Hannu Uusitalo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Acute infectious conjunctivitis in childhood.

Authors:  R Chawla; J D Kellner; W F Astle
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Topical Lomefloxacin versus Topical Chloramphenicol in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Conjunctivitis.

Authors:  A Agius-Fernandez; A Patterson; M Fsadni; A Jauch; P S Raj
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  A randomised controlled trial of management strategies for acute infective conjunctivitis in general practice.

Authors:  Hazel A Everitt; Paul S Little; Peter W F Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-07-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.