BACKGROUND: Average vitamin D intake is low in Finland. Even though almost all retail milk and margarine are fortified with vitamin D, the vitamin D intake is inadequate for a significant proportion of the population. Consequently, expanded food fortification with vitamin D would be motivated. However, there is a risk of unacceptably high intakes due to the rather narrow range of the adequate and safe intake. Therefore, a safe and efficient food fortification practice should be found for vitamin D. AIM OF THE STUDY: To develop a model for optimal food fortification and apply it to vitamin D. METHOD: The FINDIET 2002 Study (48-h recall and data on supplement use (n = 2007), and 3 + 3 days' food records, n = 247) was used as the test data. The proportion of the population whose vitamin D intake is between the recommended intake (RI) and the upper tolerable intake level (UL) was plotted against the fortification level per energy for selected foods. The fortification level that maximized the proportion of the population falling between RI and UL was considered the optimal fortification level. RESULTS: If only milk, butter milk, yoghurt and margarine were fortified, it would be impossible to find a fortification level by which the intake of the whole population would lie within the RI-UL range. However, if all potentially fortifiable foods were fortified with vitamin D at level 1.2-1.5 microg/100 kcal, the intake of the whole adult population would be between the currently recommended intake of 7.5 microg/d and the current tolerable upper intake level of 50 microg/day (model 1). If the RI was set to 40 microg/day and UL to 250 microg/day, the optimal fortification level would be 9.2 microg/100 kcal in the scenario where all potentially fortifiable foods were fortified (model 2). Also in this model the whole population would fall between the RI-UL range. CONCLUSIONS: Our model of adding a specific level of vitamin D/100 kcal to all potentially fortifiable foods (1.2-1.5 microg/100 kcal in model 1 and 9.2 microg/100 kcal in model 2) seems to be an efficient and safe food fortification practise.
BACKGROUND: Average vitamin D intake is low in Finland. Even though almost all retail milk and margarine are fortified with vitamin D, the vitamin D intake is inadequate for a significant proportion of the population. Consequently, expanded food fortification with vitamin D would be motivated. However, there is a risk of unacceptably high intakes due to the rather narrow range of the adequate and safe intake. Therefore, a safe and efficient food fortification practice should be found for vitamin D. AIM OF THE STUDY: To develop a model for optimal food fortification and apply it to vitamin D. METHOD: The FINDIET 2002 Study (48-h recall and data on supplement use (n = 2007), and 3 + 3 days' food records, n = 247) was used as the test data. The proportion of the population whose vitamin D intake is between the recommended intake (RI) and the upper tolerable intake level (UL) was plotted against the fortification level per energy for selected foods. The fortification level that maximized the proportion of the population falling between RI and UL was considered the optimal fortification level. RESULTS: If only milk, butter milk, yoghurt and margarine were fortified, it would be impossible to find a fortification level by which the intake of the whole population would lie within the RI-UL range. However, if all potentially fortifiable foods were fortified with vitamin D at level 1.2-1.5 microg/100 kcal, the intake of the whole adult population would be between the currently recommended intake of 7.5 microg/d and the current tolerable upper intake level of 50 microg/day (model 1). If the RI was set to 40 microg/day and UL to 250 microg/day, the optimal fortification level would be 9.2 microg/100 kcal in the scenario where all potentially fortifiable foods were fortified (model 2). Also in this model the whole population would fall between the RI-UL range. CONCLUSIONS: Our model of adding a specific level of vitamin D/100 kcal to all potentially fortifiable foods (1.2-1.5 microg/100 kcal in model 1 and 9.2 microg/100 kcal in model 2) seems to be an efficient and safe food fortification practise.
Authors: G R Goldberg; A E Black; S A Jebb; T J Cole; P R Murgatroyd; W A Coward; A M Prentice Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 1991-12 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Edward Giovannucci; Walter C Willett; Thomas Dietrich; Bess Dawson-Hughes Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: K S Scanlon; S Blank; T Sinks; S Lett; P Mueller; D S Freedman; M Serdula; H Falk Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Timothy J Key; Arthur Schatzkin; Walter C Willett; Naomi E Allen; Elizabeth A Spencer; Ruth C Travis Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Christoph von Domarus; Jonathan Brown; Florian Barvencik; Michael Amling; Pia Pogoda Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Johanna T Dwyer; Kathryn L Wiemer; Omar Dary; Carl L Keen; Janet C King; Kevin B Miller; Martin A Philbert; Valerie Tarasuk; Christine L Taylor; P Courtney Gaine; Ashley B Jarvis; Regan L Bailey Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Albert Flynn; Tero Hirvonen; Gert B M Mensink; Marga C Ocké; Lluis Serra-Majem; Katarzyna Stos; Lucjan Szponar; Inge Tetens; Aida Turrini; Reg Fletcher; Tanja Wildemann Journal: Food Nutr Res Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 3.894