Literature DB >> 17513956

Safety and efficacy of posterior instrumentation for patients with congenital scoliosis and spinal dysraphism.

Mehmet Ayvaz1, Ahmet Alanay, Muharrem Yazici, Emre Acaroglu, Nejat Akalan, Cemalettin Aksoy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Instrumentation and correction of severe congenital scoliosis, particularly in patients with spinal dysraphism, has been reported to cause a high potential rate of neurological compromise after instrumentation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of posterior instrumentation and correction of congenital scoliosis with accompanying spinal dysraphism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV therapeutic studies.
METHODS: Retrospective x-ray measurements to analyze the efficacy and the evaluation of hospital charts to document the intraoperative and postoperative complications were performed for a consecutive patient series. Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire was used to analyze the health-related quality of life.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (18 girls and 4 boys) formed the basis of the study. The average age was 12 years (range, 7-18 years) and the average follow-up period was 3.2 years (range, 2-10 years). The types of spinal dysraphism were diastematomyelia in 20 patients and syringomyelia with tethered cord in 2 patients. Twelve patients had previous surgery and 3 patients had simultaneous surgeries for spinal dysraphism. Posterior instrumentation with/without anterior release and fusion was performed in all patients. Major curve was corrected from an average of 71 degrees to 40 degrees (correction rate, 43.6%). The compensatory curve was corrected from an average of 47 degrees to 25 degrees (correction rate, 46.8%). The average loss of correction at final follow-up was 2.2 degrees for major curve and 3.5 degrees for the compensatory curve. The average scores for the 5 domains of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire were 3.5 for function, 3.9 for pain, 3.5 for self-image, 3.6 for mental health, 3.9 for satisfaction, and 3.6 for total. Neurological monitoring was conducted by using the wake-up test in all patients. The overall complication rate was 31%, including neurological compromise in 2 patients (9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Spinal instrumentation was effective for the control of deformity with a relatively higher rate of complications. However, with respect to high complication rate, the ideal solution for managing the congenital cases is still to prevent the progression of the curve with early intervention by using the optimal surgical approach for that particular patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17513956     DOI: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000271334.73643.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  12 in total

Review 1.  Is detethering necessary before deformity correction in congenital scoliosis associated with tethered cord syndrome: a meta-analysis of current evidence.

Authors:  Kaustubh Ahuja; Syed Ifthekar; Samarth Mittal; Gagandeep Yadav; P Venkata Sudhakar; Sitanshu Barik; Pankaj Kandwal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Management of concomitant scoliosis and tethered cord syndrome in non-spina bifida pediatric population.

Authors:  Kaan Yaltırık; Najib E El Tecle; Matthew J Pierson; Aki Puryear; Basar Atalay; Samer K Elbabaa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Investigating the landscape and trajectory of spina bifida research in Asia: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Mary Nadine Alessandra R Uy; Ourlad Alzeus G Tantengco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 1.532

Review 4.  [Congenital malformations of the growing spine : When should treatment be conservative and when should it be surgical?].

Authors:  T F Fekete; D Haschtmann; C-E Heyde; F Kleinstück; D Jeszenszky
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Prevalence of complications in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a literature meta-analysis from the past 15 years.

Authors:  Shallu Sharma; Chunsen Wu; Thomas Andersen; Yu Wang; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Cody Eric Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Surgical and conservative treatment of patients with congenital scoliosis: α search for long-term results.

Authors:  Angelos Kaspiris; Theodoros B Grivas; Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Deborah Turnbull
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2011-06-04

7.  Concurrent tethered cord release and growing-rod implantation-is it safe?

Authors:  Jon E Oda; Suken A Shah; William G Mackenzie; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-12-04

8.  Posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction for the treatment of rigid congenital scoliosis associated with split cord malformation.

Authors:  Hong-Qi Zhang; Ang Deng; Ming-Xing Tang; Shao-Hua Liu; Yu-Xiang Wang; Qi-Le Gao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Rate of complications in scoliosis surgery - a systematic review of the Pub Med literature.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Deborah Goodall
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2008-08-05

10.  Radiographic characteristics in congenital scoliosis associated with split cord malformation: a retrospective study of 266 surgical cases.

Authors:  Fan Feng; Haining Tan; Xingye Li; Chong Chen; Zheng Li; Jianguo Zhang; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.