Literature DB >> 17513955

Effectiveness of the SpineCor brace based on the new standardized criteria proposed by the scoliosis research society for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Christine Coillard1, Valerie Vachon, Alin B Circo, Marie Beauséjour, Charles H Rivard.   

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Dynamic SpineCor brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in accordance with the standardized criteria proposed by the Scoliosis Research Society Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. They proposed these guidelines to make the comparison among studies more valid and reliable. From 1993 to 2006, 493 patients were treated using the SpineCor brace. Two hundred forty-nine patients met the criteria for inclusion, and 79 patients were still actively being treated. Overall, 170 patients have a definitive outcome. All girls were premenarchal or less than 1 year postmenarchal. Assessment of brace effectiveness included (1) percentage of patients who have 5 degrees or less curve progression, and percentage of patients who have 6 degrees or more progression; (2) percentage of patients who have been recommended/undergone surgery before skeletal maturity; (3) percentage of patients with curves exceeding 45 degrees at maturity (end of treatment); and (4) Two-year follow-up beyond maturity to determine the percentage of patients who subsequently underwent surgery. Successful treatment (correction, >5 degrees, or stabilization, +/-5 degrees) was achieved in 101 (59.4%) of the 170 patients from the time of the fitting of the SpineCor brace to the point in which it was discontinued. Thirty-nine immature patients (22.9%) required surgical fusion while receiving treatment. Two (1.2%) of 170 patients had curves exceeding 45 degrees at maturity. One mature patient (2.1%) required surgery within 2 years of follow-up beyond skeletal maturity. The conclusion drawn from these findings is that the SpineCor brace is effective for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Moreover, positive outcomes are maintained after 2 years because 45 (95.7%) of 47 patients stabilized or corrected their end of bracing Cobb angle up to 2 years after bracing. Therapeutic study-investigating the results of treatment: level II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17513955     DOI: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000271330.64234.db

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  33 in total

1.  Introduction to the "Scoliosis" Journal Brace Technology Thematic Series: increasing existing knowledge and promoting future developments.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Theodoros B Grivas
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-01-28

2.  Objective compliance of adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis in a dynamic SpineCor brace.

Authors:  Carol C Hasler; Stephanie Wietlisbach; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 3.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: indications for bracing and conservative treatments.

Authors:  André J Kaelin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

4.  SpineCor treatment for Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis: SOSORT award 2010 winner.

Authors:  Christine Coillard; Alin B Circo; Charles H Rivard
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-11-10

5.  Preference assessment of recruitment into a randomized trial for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Vani Sabesan; Stuart L Weinstein; Kevin F Spratt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  [Brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a retrospective study and analysis according to the SRS criteria].

Authors:  C Heidt; E Kong; I Torode; J Balakumar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Brace management in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jonathan R Schiller; Nikhil A Thakur; Craig P Eberson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  A history of bracing for idiopathic scoliosis in North America.

Authors:  Reginald S Fayssoux; Robert H Cho; Martin J Herman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardized criteria.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Tsz Ping Lam; Man Sang Wong; Bobby Kin Wah Ng; Kwong Man Lee; King Lok Liu; Lik Hang Hung; Ajax Hong Yin Lau; Sai Wing Sin; Wing Kwan Kwok; Fiona Wai Ping Yu; Yong Qiu; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Sabrina Donzelli; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Dariusz Czaprowski; Sanja Schreiber; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Helmut Diers; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Andrea Lebel; Cindy Marti; Toru Maruyama; Joe O'Brien; Nigel Price; Eric Parent; Manuel Rigo; Michele Romano; Luke Stikeleather; James Wynne; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.