Literature DB >> 17512970

Body mass distribution and gait mechanics in fat-tailed dwarf lemurs (Cheirogaleus medius) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas).

Jesse W Young1, Biren A Patel, Nancy J Stevens.   

Abstract

Most quadrupeds walk with lateral sequence (LS) gaits, where hind limb touchdowns are followed by ipsilateral forelimb touchdowns. Primates, however, typically walk with diagonal sequence (DS) gaits, where hind limb touchdowns are followed by contralateral forelimb touchdowns. Because the use of DS gaits is nearly ubiquitous among primates, understanding gait selection in primates is critical to understanding primate locomotor evolution. The Support Polygon Model [Tomita, M., 1967. A study on the movement pattern of four limbs in walking. J. Anthropol. Soc. Nippon 75, 120-146; Rollinson, J., Martin, R.D., 1981. Comparative aspects of primate locomotion, with special reference to arboreal cercopithecines. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 48, 377-427] argues that primates' use of DS gaits stems from a more caudal position of the whole-body center of mass (COM) relative to other mammals. We tested the predictions of the Support Polygon Model by examining the effects of natural and experimental variations in COM position on gait mechanics in two distantly related primates: fat-tailed dwarf lemurs (Cheirogaleus medius) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas). Dwarf lemur experiments compared individuals with and without a greatly enlarged tail (a feature associated with torpor that can be expected to shift the COM caudally). During patas monkey experiments, we experimentally shifted the COM cranially with the use of a weighted belt (7-12% of body mass) positioned above the scapulae. Examination of limb kinematics revealed changes consistent with systematic deviations in COM position. Nevertheless, footfall patterns changed in a direction contrary to the predictions of the Support Polygon Model in the dwarf lemurs and did not change at all in the patas monkey. These results suggest that body mass distribution is unlikely to be the sole determinant of footfall pattern in primates and other mammals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17512970     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  6 in total

1.  Human quadrupeds, primate quadrupedalism, and Uner Tan Syndrome.

Authors:  Liza J Shapiro; Whitney G Cole; Jesse W Young; David A Raichlen; Scott R Robinson; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Segmental morphometrics of the olive baboon (Papio anubis): a longitudinal study from birth to adulthood.

Authors:  François Druelle; Peter Aerts; Kristiaan D'Août; Valérie Moulin; Gilles Berillon
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  A quantitative evaluation of physical and digital approaches to centre of mass estimation.

Authors:  Sophie Macaulay; John R Hutchinson; Karl T Bates
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Limb phase flexibility in walking: a test case in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus).

Authors:  Charlotte Elizabeth Miller; Laura Elizabeth Johnson; Henry Pinkard; Pierre Lemelin; Daniel Schmitt
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Hip anatomy and ontogeny of lower limb musculature in three species of nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Jeremy J Baker; Katherine J Searight; Madeliene Atzeva Stump; Matthew B Kehrer; Colleen Shanafelt; Eric Graham; Timothy D Smith
Journal:  Anat Res Int       Date:  2011-07-19

6.  Lateral movements of a massive tail influence gecko locomotion: an integrative study comparing tail restriction and autotomy.

Authors:  Kevin Jagnandan; Timothy E Higham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.