Literature DB >> 17512612

Comparison of upper and lower lip muscle activity between stutterers and fluent speakers.

Cláudia Maria de Felício1, Rosana Luiza Rodrigues Gomes Freitas, Mathias Vitti, Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is a widespread clinical view that stuttering is associated with high levels of muscles activity. The proposal of this research was to compare stutterers and fluent speakers with respect to the electromyographic activity of the upper and lower lip muscles.
METHODS: Ten individuals who stutter and 10 fluent speakers (control group) paired by gender and age were studied (mean age: 13.4 years). Groups were defined by the speech sample analysis of the ABFW-Language Test. A K6-I EMG (Myo-tronics Co., Seattle, WA, USA) with double disposable silver electrodes (Duotrodes, Myo-tronics Co., Seattle, WA) being used in order to analyze lip muscle activity. The clinical conditions investigated were movements during speech, orofacial non-speech tasks, and rest. Electromyographic data were normalized by lip pursing activity. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used for the comparison of speech fluency profile, and the Student t-test for independent samples for group comparison regarding electromyographic data.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between groups regarding speech fluency profile and upper lip activity in the following conditions: lip lateralization to the right and to the left and rest before exercises (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups regarding lower lip activity (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: The EMG activity of the upper lip muscle in the group with stuttering was significantly lower than in the control group in some of the clinical conditions analyzed. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the lower lip muscle. The subjects who stutter did not present higher levels of muscle activity in lip muscles than fluent speakers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17512612     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  6 in total

1.  Oral electromyography activation patterns for speech are similar in preschoolers who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The use of a mandibular repositioning device for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Fernando G J Leite; Renata C S Rodrigues; Ricardo F Ribeiro; Alan L Eckeli; Simone C H Regalo; Luiz G Sousa; Regina M F Fernandes; Fabiana C P Valera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Speech Movement Variability in People Who Stutter: A Vocal Tract Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Charlotte E E Wiltshire; Mark Chiew; Jennifer Chesters; Máiréad P Healy; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Phonological Abilities in Persian Speaking Preschool Children with Stuttering and Fluent Peers.

Authors:  Neda Tahmasebi; Akram Ahmadi; Peyman Zamani; Mozhgan Nourafshan; Farzaneh Salehimanesh
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2019

5.  Effect of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion on masticatory muscle activity: A pilot study.

Authors:  Cássio E Sverzut; Karinna Martorelli; Roberto Jabur; Alice D Petri; Alexandre E Trivellato; Selma Siéssere; Simone C H Regalo
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01

6.  Hemispheric lateralization of motor thresholds in relation to stuttering.

Authors:  Per A Alm; Ragnhild Karlsson; Madeleine Sundberg; Hans W Axelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.