Literature DB >> 17512597

Is it worth reoperating on macular holes?

Xavier Valldeperas1, David Wong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the visual outcome after a second surgical attempt to close idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) in patients who underwent unsuccessful primary surgery and in patients with reopened FTMHs.
DESIGN: Retrospective single-center case series. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred thirty-two patients underwent surgery for FTMH in St. Paul's Eye Unit, Liverpool, United Kingdom, between March, 1995, and March, 2005. Fifty-one patients had unclosed FTMHs (unclosed group) and 21 patients had reopened FTMHs after initially successful surgery (reopened group).
METHODS: All patients underwent a second pars plana vitrectomy. Autologous platelet concentrate and perfluoropropane endotamponade were used. Internal limiting membrane peeling was carried out in selected cases. Patients were instructed to maintain a face-down position for 2 weeks after the surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anatomic and visual results.
RESULTS: All patients in the reopened group and 76% of patients in the unclosed group achieved successfully closure of the FTMH after the second surgery. Mean decimal Snellen visual acuity (VA; +/-standard deviation [SD]) before the second surgery was 0.14+/-0.10 (range, 0.01-0.33) in the reopened group and 0.10+/-0.07 (range, hand movements [HM]-0.33) in the unclosed group. The best VA was achieved after cataract surgery; the mean best VA (+/-SD) in the reopened group was 0.42+/-0.31 (range, 0.05-1) and in the unclosed group was 0.19+/-0.14 (range, HM-0.66).
CONCLUSIONS: Reoperating on reopened FTMH resulted in 100% anatomic closure and significant improvement in vision. In contrast, reoperating on patients with initially unsuccessful surgery resulted a lower anatomic closure rate and relatively poor final vision even if their macular holes were closed successfully. This information may help surgeons and patients decide whether to undertake a second operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17512597     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  12 in total

1.  Heavy silicone oil tamponade after failed macular hole surgery with perfluoropropane (C3F8): a report of five cases.

Authors:  Muhammad Usman Saeed; Heinrich Heimann; David Wong; Syed Khurshid Gibran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Heavy silicone oil (Densiron-68) for the treatment of persistent macular holes: Densiron-68 endotamponade for persistent macular holes.

Authors:  Stanislao Rizzo; Federica Genovesi-Ebert; Andrea Vento; Federica Cresti; Sofia Miniaci; Maria Chiara Romagnoli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Autologous neurosensory retinal transplantation for large refractory idiopathic macular hole.

Authors:  Kenan Sonmez
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Re-operation of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes after initial surgery with internal limiting membrane peel.

Authors:  Mark J J D'Souza; Varun Chaudhary; Robert Devenyi; Peter J Kertes; Wai-Ching Lam
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  FIRST FAILED MACULAR HOLE SURGERY OR REOPENING OF A PREVIOUSLY CLOSED HOLE: Do We Gain by Reoperating?-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerard A Reid; Niamh McDonagh; David M Wright; John T O Yek; Rohan W Essex; Noemi Lois
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.975

6.  A multi-center study of prediction of macular hole status after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling by a deep learning model.

Authors:  Yijun Hu; Yu Xiao; Wuxiu Quan; Bin Zhang; Yuqing Wu; Qiaowei Wu; Baoyi Liu; Xiaomin Zeng; Ying Fang; Yu Hu; Songfu Feng; Ling Yuan; Tao Li; Hongmin Cai; Honghua Yu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

7.  Surgical Management of Recurrent and Persistent Macular Holes: A Practical Approach.

Authors:  Jessica L Cao; Peter K Kaiser
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-09-07

8.  Management of Stage IV Macular Holes: When Standard Surgery Fails.

Authors:  R Reis; N Ferreira; A Meireles
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-08

Review 9.  Refractory full thickness macular hole: current surgical management.

Authors:  Rino Frisina; Irene Gius; Luigi Tozzi; Edoardo Midena
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.456

10.  Evaluation of secondary surgery to enlarge the peeling of the internal limiting membrane following the failed surgery of idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Xin Che; Fanglin He; Linna Lu; Dongqing Zhu; Xiaofang Xu; Xin Song; Xianqun Fan; Zhiliang Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.