OBJECTIVE: To assess upper urinary tract complications and renal function in patients with a submucosal tunnel and serosa-lined extramural tunnel ureter implantation during the long-term follow-up of ileocaecal continent cutaneous urinary diversion (Mainz pouch I). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 458 patients who had diversion with the ileocaecal pouch were analysed in a retrospective follow-up study. Uretero-intestinal implantation was done using a submucosal tunnel (ST) in 809 reno-ureteric units (RUs) and by the serosa-lined extramural tunnel (ET) technique in 74 RUs. The median age of the patients at the time of surgery was 47.1 years, and the median follow-up was 89.0 months. RESULTS: For the ST, there was anastomotic obstruction in 59 RUs (7.3%) at a median of 16.8 months after diversion; the obstruction-free intervals at 1, 5 and 10 years were 97%, 93% and 91%, respectively. Obstruction rates were 13.9% for previously dilated upper tracts and 17.1% in patients with a neurogenic bladder. Serum creatinine levels were < or =1.6 mg/dL in 97% of the patients at the latest follow-up. For ET, there was anastomotic obstruction in three RUs (4.1%) at a median of 17.2 months after diversion. Obstruction-free intervals at 1, 5 and 10 years were 100%, 96% and 96%. Preoperative dilation of the upper tracts did not reduce the obstruction rate (3.1%), but it was 7.1% in patients with a neurogenic bladder. Serum creatinine levels were < or =1.6 mg/dL in 98% of the patients at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The ET gives lower obstruction rates than the ST, especially when upper tracts are dilated and in patients with a neurogenic bladder. Renal function remained stable with both techniques in the long term.
OBJECTIVE: To assess upper urinary tract complications and renal function in patients with a submucosal tunnel and serosa-lined extramural tunnel ureter implantation during the long-term follow-up of ileocaecal continent cutaneous urinary diversion (Mainz pouch I). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 458 patients who had diversion with the ileocaecal pouch were analysed in a retrospective follow-up study. Uretero-intestinal implantation was done using a submucosal tunnel (ST) in 809 reno-ureteric units (RUs) and by the serosa-lined extramural tunnel (ET) technique in 74 RUs. The median age of the patients at the time of surgery was 47.1 years, and the median follow-up was 89.0 months. RESULTS: For the ST, there was anastomotic obstruction in 59 RUs (7.3%) at a median of 16.8 months after diversion; the obstruction-free intervals at 1, 5 and 10 years were 97%, 93% and 91%, respectively. Obstruction rates were 13.9% for previously dilated upper tracts and 17.1% in patients with a neurogenic bladder. Serum creatinine levels were < or =1.6 mg/dL in 97% of the patients at the latest follow-up. For ET, there was anastomotic obstruction in three RUs (4.1%) at a median of 17.2 months after diversion. Obstruction-free intervals at 1, 5 and 10 years were 100%, 96% and 96%. Preoperative dilation of the upper tracts did not reduce the obstruction rate (3.1%), but it was 7.1% in patients with a neurogenic bladder. Serum creatinine levels were < or =1.6 mg/dL in 98% of the patients at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The ET gives lower obstruction rates than the ST, especially when upper tracts are dilated and in patients with a neurogenic bladder. Renal function remained stable with both techniques in the long term.