Literature DB >> 17511751

Enhancing the validity and utility of randomized clinical trials in addictions treatment research: III. Data processing and statistical analysis.

Frances K Del Boca1, Jack Darkes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This is the third paper in a series that reviews strategies for optimizing the validity and utility of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in addictions treatment research. Whereas the two previous papers focused on design and implementation, here we address issues pertaining to data processing and statistical analysis. SCOPE: Recommendations for enhancing data quality and utility are offered in sections on data coding and entry; and data format, structure and management. We discuss the need for preliminary data analyses that examine statistical power; patterns of attrition; between-group equivalence; and treatment integrity and discriminability. We discuss tests of treatment efficacy, as well as ancillary analyses aimed at explicating treatment processes.
CONCLUSIONS: Safeguards are necessary to protect data quality, and advance planning is needed to ensure that data formats are compatible with statistical objectives. In addition to treatment efficacy, statistical analyses should evaluate study internal and external validity, and investigate the change mechanisms that underlie treatment effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17511751     DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01864.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  4 in total

1.  When research meets reality-lessons learned from a pragmatic multisite group-randomized clinical trial on psychosocial interventions in the psychiatric and addiction field.

Authors:  Linda E Wüsthoff; Helge Waal; Rolf W Gråwe
Journal:  Subst Abuse       Date:  2012-08-16

2.  The effect of using assessment instruments on substance-abuse outpatients' adherence to treatment: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Veerle Raes; Cor A J De Jong; Dirk De Bacquer; Eric Broekaert; Jan De Maeseneer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  THE SAAF STUDY: evaluation of the Safeguarding Children Assessment and Analysis Framework (SAAF), compared with management as usual, for improving outcomes for children and young people who have experienced, or are at risk of, maltreatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Geraldine Macdonald; Jane Lewis; Kenneth Macdonald; Evie Gardner; Lynn Murphy; Catherine Adams; Deborah Ghate; Richard Cotmore; Jonathan Green
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Faith-based intervention, change of religiosity, and abstinence of substance addicts.

Authors:  Jerf W K Yeung
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.697

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.