Literature DB >> 17511722

Population-based screening for prostate cancer by measuring total serum prostate-specific antigen in Iran.

Seyyed Yousof Hosseini1, Massood Moharramzadeh, Ali Reza Ghadian, Hassan Hooshyar, Ali Reza Lashay, Mohammah Reza Safarinejad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the results from an Iranian large population-based randomized study of screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to detect prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3758 Iranian men older than 40 years were mass checked by PSA-based screening. Men with an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum total PSA level of greater than 4 ng/mL, underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided extended prostate biopsy.
RESULTS: The PSA value (mean +/- standard deviation, SD) in all men without prostate cancer was 1.6 +/- 1.1 ng/mL and in those with cancer 18 +/- 44.8 ng/mL (P = 0.001). PSA values increased with age. In those aged 40-49, 50-59, 60-69 and > or = 70 years, the mean +/- SD PSA values were 1.3 +/- 0.7, 1.4 +/- 0.8, 1.8 +/- 1 and 2.2 +/- 1.6 ng/mL, respectively. Among the screened men, 323 (8.6%) had a serum PSA concentration greater than 4 ng/mL. Of patients who underwent prostate biopsy (230, 71.2%), 129 (positive predictive value, 56.1%) had prostate cancer. Additionally, nine cancers were detected among 16 patients with PSA of less than 4 ng/mL who had a doubtful DRE finding. The overall cancer detection rate was 3.6%; 1.4% at 40-49, 1.6% at 50-59, 4.2% at 60-69 and 12.9% at >/=70 years. Conventional systematic sextant biopsies, which accounted for six of the 10 cores in our biopsy scheme, detected 98 (71%) of the cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: The Iranian male population develops prostate cancer quite commonly if their serum PSA levels are greater than 4.0 ng/mL. In this study, 65.9% of the detected cancers were clinically significant. The conventional systematic sextant technique may be inappropriate for detection of all prostate cancers. The results need to be confirmed in other randomized trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17511722     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01729.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  6 in total

1.  Clinical and pathological characteristics of screen-detected versus clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in Nanjing, China.

Authors:  LiXin Hua; Di Qiao; Bin Xu; NingHan Feng; Gong Cheng; JieXiu Zhang; NingHong Song; Wei Zhang; Jie Yang; JianGang Chen; YuanGeng Sui; HongFei Wu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Evaluation of prostate cancer prevalence in Iranian male population with increased PSA level, a one center experience.

Authors:  Mohammad Kazem Moslemi; Fariborz Lotfi; Seyed Ali Tahvildar
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Differences in prostate cancer detection between Canadian and Saudi populations.

Authors:  O Z Al-Abdin; D M Rabah; G Badr; A Kotb; A Aprikian
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 2.590

4.  The value of the plasma circulating cell-free DNA concentration and integrity index as a clinical tool for prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective case-control cohort study in an Iranian population.

Authors:  Maryam Khani; Jalil Hosseini; Reza Mirfakhraie; Mohsen Habibi; Eznollah Azargashb; Farkhondeh Pouresmaeili
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Age-specific reference ranges of prostate-specific antigen in the elderly of Amirkola: A population-based study.

Authors:  Hosseini Seyed Reza; Zabihi Ali; Habibian Tara; Bijani Ali
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2020-03-07

Review 6.  The Clinical Efficacy of Prostate Cancer Screening in Worldwide and Iran: Narrative Review.

Authors:  Shima Shahyad; Seyed Hassan Saadat; Seyed-Mostafa Hosseini-Zijoud
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2018-03-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.