Literature DB >> 17511702

Cancer anxiety and the perception of risk in alarmed communities.

Craig W Trumbo1, Katherine A McComas, Prathana Kannaovakun.   

Abstract

Cancer is a significant public health topic and is frequently a factor in public reactions to environmental hazards. It may be reasonable to suggest that a unique form of health anxiety exists - one specific to cancer. In this article, we explore a measure of cancer anxiety that has applicability to risk perception in the specific context of communities that are alarmed over suspect cancer rates thought to be associated with environmental hazards. A literature search was used to identify survey questions previously used to measure cancer worry, fear, anxiety, etc. A list of 24 items was employed in a mail survey sent to 30 communities in which cancer rates were under investigation (part of a broader study). An analysis of the dataset of 1,111 responses yields two versions of a cancer anxiety scale: one an additive combination of 21 items (alpha= 0.77) and the other a two-factor model consisting of nine- and four-item subscales (alpha= 0.74 and 0.69). The resulting scales are evaluated for their ability to predict perception of risk from the environmental hazards in these cases. Controlling for age, sex, and cancer status, the scales explain between 2% and 10% of risk perception (full R(2) values ranging from 0.17 to 0.24). Given the range of concepts required to model risk perception, we conclude that this measure of cancer anxiety is sufficiently reliable and robust to be recommended for use in circumstances involving hazards associated with cancer. Other uses and further development of the measure are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17511702     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00886.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  7 in total

1.  Concern about petrochemical health risk before and after a refinery explosion.

Authors:  Malcolm P Cutchin; Kathryn Remmes Martin; Steven V Owen; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Real or illusory? Case studies on the public perception of environmental health risks in the north west of England.

Authors:  Alex G Stewart; Paolo Luria; John Reid; Mary Lyons; Richard Jarvis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  The influence of uncertain map features on risk beliefs and perceived ambiguity for maps of modeled cancer risk from air pollution.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson; Jeffrey D Myers
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Fate control and ingroup bias in donation for the fight with the coronavirus pandemic: The mediating role of risk perception of COVID-19.

Authors:  Wen-Qiao Li; Liman Man Wai Li; Da Jiang; Shuang Liu
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2020-10-13

5.  Adverse Health Impacts of Living Near an Oil Refinery in Jordan.

Authors:  Moawiah Khatatbeh; Karem Alzoubi; Omar Khabour; Wael Al-Delaimy
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2020-12-24

6.  Deaths and medical visits attributable to environmental pollution in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson; Jens Thomsen; Frederic Launay; Elizabeth Harder; Nicholas DeFelice
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An In-Depth Exploration of Knowledge and Beliefs Associated with Soda and Diet Soda Consumption.

Authors:  Caroline Miller; Kerry Ettridge; Melanie Wakefield; Simone Pettigrew; John Coveney; David Roder; Sarah Durkin; Gary Wittert; Jane Martin; Joanne Dono
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.