Literature DB >> 17511243

[In-group bias in trusting behavior: a choice of allocator experiment with minimal groups].

Naoto Suzuki1, Yusuke Konno, Toshio Yamagishi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to show that expectations of generalized reciprocity within one's own group are responsible for in-group trust. To test this hypothesis, an allocator choice game in the minimal group situation was used. We assigned the role of a recipient in a dictator game to all 81 subjects, and measured whether they chose to be a recipient of either an in-group or an out-group "allocator" who freely allocate a fixed reward between him/her and a recipient. The results indicate that in-group trust occurs only in the condition in which recipients know that allocators make a reward allocation knowing the group membership of their recipient; recipients show no preference for either an in-group or an out-group allocator when allocators make the decision without knowing the group membership of their recipient. It is thus shown that participants' in-group trust is derived from the general belief that people treat in-group members more favorably than out-group members-a belief about generalized reciprocity within groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17511243     DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.78.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shinrigaku Kenkyu        ISSN: 0021-5236


  1 in total

1.  Neurocultural evidence that ideal affect match promotes giving.

Authors:  BoKyung Park; Elizabeth Blevins; Brian Knutson; Jeanne L Tsai
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.436

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.