Literature DB >> 17510503

Relationship between radial and central arterial pulse wave and evaluation of central aortic pressure using the radial arterial pulse wave.

Kenji Takazawa1, Hideyuki Kobayashi, Naohisa Shindo, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Akira Yamashina.   

Abstract

Since a decrease of central aortic pressure contributes to the prevention of cardiovascular events, simple measurement of not only brachial blood pressure but also central aortic pressure may be useful in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we simultaneously measured radial artery pulse waves non-invasively and ascending aortic pressure invasively, before and after the administration of nicorandil. We then compared changes in central aortic pressure and radial arterial blood pressure calibrated with brachial blood pressure in addition to calculating the augmentation index (AI) at the aorta and radial artery. After nicorandil administration, the reduction in maximal systolic blood pressure in the aorta (Deltaa-SBP) was -14+/-15 mmHg, significantly larger than that in early systolic pressure in the radial artery (Deltar-SBP) (-9+/-12 mmHg). The reduction in late systolic blood pressure in the radial artery (Deltar-SBP2) was -15+/-14 mmHg, significantly larger than Deltar-SBP, but not significantly different from Deltaa-SBP. There were significant relationships between Deltaa-SBP and Deltar-SBP (r=0.81, p<0.001), and between Deltaa-SBP and Deltar-SBP2 (r=0.91, p<0.001). The slope of the correlation regression line with Deltar-SBP2 (0.83) was larger and closer to 1 than that with Deltar-SBP (0.63), showing that the relationship was close to 1:1. Significant correlations were obtained between aortic AI (a-AI) and radial AI (r-AI) (before nicorandil administration: r=0.91, p<0.001; after administration: r=0.70, p<0.001). These data suggest that the measurement of radial artery pulse wave and observation of changes in the late systolic blood pressure in the radial artery (r-SBP2) in addition to the ordinary measurement of brachial blood pressure may enable a more accurate evaluation of changes in maximal systolic blood pressure in the aorta (a-SBP).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17510503     DOI: 10.1291/hypres.30.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  53 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive studies of central aortic pressure.

Authors:  Michael F O'Rourke; Audrey Adji
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Older age is associated with greater central aortic blood pressure following the exercise stress test in subjects with similar brachial systolic blood pressure.

Authors:  Masatake Kobayashi; Kazutaka Oshima; Yoichi Iwasaki; Yuto Kumai; Alberto Avolio; Akira Yamashina; Kenji Takazawa
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Antihypertensive drugs and central blood pressure.

Authors:  Carmel M McEniery
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Central blood pressure estimation by using N-point moving average method in the brachial pulse wave.

Authors:  Rie Sugawara; Shigeo Horinaka; Hiroshi Yagi; Kimihiko Ishimura; Takeharu Honda
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Hemodynamic Determinants of the Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability: Differential Roles of Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflection.

Authors:  Pai-Feng Hsu; Hao-Min Cheng; Shih-Hsien Sung; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Edward G Lakatta; Frank C P Yin; Pesus Chou; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Different associations between blood pressure indices and carotid artery damages in a community-based population of China.

Authors:  G Cheng; F Fan; Y Zhang; L Qi; J Jia; Y Liu; L Gao; X Han; Y Yang; Y Huo
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.012

7.  Central pressure should not be used in clinical practice.

Authors:  Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  Artery Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.597

Review 8.  Central blood pressure and chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Yoichi Ohno; Yoshihiko Kanno; Tsuneo Takenaka
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-06

9.  Effects of nicorandil on the reduction of BNP levels in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Tomonori Kimura; Harumi Kitamura; Kazunori Inoue; Noritaka Kawada; Isao Matsui; Yasuyuki Nagasawa; Yoshitsugu Obi; Maki Shinzawa; Yasuhiko Sakata; Takayuki Hamono; Hiromi Rakugi; Yoshitaka Isaka
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.801

10.  Women have significantly greater difference between central and peripheral arterial pressure compared with men: the Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  Rebecca Chester; Gary Sander; Camilo Fernandez; Wei Chen; Gerald Berenson; Thomas Giles
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2013-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.