Literature DB >> 17509917

Foot-and-mouth disease: a review of intranasal infection of cattle, sheep and pigs.

Robert Sellers1, John Gloster.   

Abstract

In an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) it is important to identify animals at risk from airborne virus. Investigations have been carried out over the years to determine the dose required to infect cattle, sheep and pigs by the intranasal route. This paper reviews the results of investigations for animals which have been infected by instillation or spraying a virus suspension into the nostrils or by exposure to affected animals through a mask or by indirect contact. The lowest doses were found by use of a mask. With virus from affected pigs given through a mask, doses of 18 infectious units (IU) in cattle and 8 IU in sheep were found to cause infection and give rise to lesions. Overall, cattle required the least amount of virus followed by sheep. Pigs required a dose of 22 IU to cause infection and a dose of 125 IU to give rise to lesions. In many experiments pigs failed to become infected. With all three species the dose varied with the individual animal and the virus strain. For modelling previous outbreaks and in real time, a dose of 8 IU or 10 and 50% infectious doses (ID50) could be used where cattle and sheep were involved. Experience in the field, combined with the results from experiments involving natural infection, indicate that pigs are not readily infected by the intranasal route. However, for modelling purposes a dose of about 25 IU should be used with care. Investigations are needed to determine doses for virus strains currently in circulation around the world. In addition, the nature of the aerosol droplets needs to be analysed to determine how the respective amounts of infective and non-infective virus particles, host components and, in later emissions, the presence of antibody affect the survival in air and ability to infect the respiratory tract. Further work is also required to correlate laboratory and field findings through incorporation of the doses into modelling the virus concentration downwind in order that those responsible for controlling FMD are provided with the best available assessment of airborne spread. Finally, the doses found for infection by the intranasal route could be applied to other methods of spread where virus is inhaled to assess risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17509917     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  11 in total

1.  Risk factors for foot and mouth disease seroprevalence in indigenous cattle in Southern Ethiopia: the effect of production system.

Authors:  B Megersa; B Beyene; F Abunna; A Regassa; K Amenu; T Rufael
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  Skin as a potential source of infectious foot and mouth disease aerosols.

Authors:  Michael B Dillon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the non-structural 3A and 3B protein-coding regions of foot-and-mouth disease virus subtype A Iran 05.

Authors:  Saber Jelokhani-Niaraki; Majid Esmaelizad; Morteza Daliri; Rasoul Vaez-Torshizi; Morteza Kamalzadeh; Mohsen Lotfi
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.672

4.  Scar Size and Other Parameters for Tracking Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Induction of Myocardial Infarcts in Sheep (Ovisaries).

Authors:  Hylton P Gordon; Michael G Katz; Anthony S Fargnoli; Virginia L Gillespie; Roger J Hajjar; Charles R Bridges
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 0.982

5.  Understanding foot-and-mouth disease virus transmission biology: identification of the indicators of infectiousness.

Authors:  Margo E Chase-Topping; Ian Handel; Bartlomiej M Bankowski; Nicholas D Juleff; Debi Gibson; Sarah J Cox; Miriam A Windsor; Elizabeth Reid; Claudia Doel; Richard Howey; Paul V Barnett; Mark E J Woolhouse; Bryan Charleston
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Identification and analysis of differential miRNAs in PK-15 cells after foot-and-mouth disease virus infection.

Authors:  Ke-Shan Zhang; Yong-Jie Liu; Han-Jin Kong; Wei-Wei Cheng; You-Jun Shang; Hong Tian; Hai-Xue Zheng; Jian-Hong Guo; Xiang-Tao Liu; Xian-Tao Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Parameterization of the Durations of Phases of Foot-And-Mouth Disease in Cattle.

Authors:  Shankar Yadav; Carolina Stenfeldt; Matthew A Branan; Karla I Moreno-Torres; Lindsey K Holmstrom; Amy H Delgado; Jonathan Arzt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-08-09

8.  Foot-and-Mouth Disease Infection Dynamics in Contact-Exposed Pigs Are Determined by the Estimated Exposure Dose.

Authors:  Karla I Moreno-Torres; Barbara P Brito; Matthew A Branan; Luis L Rodriguez; Amy H Delgado; Carolina Stenfeldt; Jonathan Arzt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-07-20

Review 9.  Understanding the molecular epidemiology of foot-and-mouth-disease virus.

Authors:  Joern Klein
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 3.342

10.  Virulence beneath the fleece; a tale of foot-and-mouth disease virus pathogenesis in sheep.

Authors:  Carolina Stenfeldt; Juan M Pacheco; Nagendrakumar B Singanallur; Wilna Vosloo; Luis L Rodriguez; Jonathan Arzt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.