Literature DB >> 17509743

The social consequences of living with and dealing with incontinence--a carers perspective.

Katherine R Brittain1, Chris Shaw.   

Abstract

Incontinence is a discrediting and stigmatising condition for those who experience it, as it signifies a person who is lacking in self-control. For their carers, the very nature of undertaking 'dirty work' signifies a low status and low paid job. Those health care professionals higher in status and financial reward put distance between themselves and bodywork, especially bodywork that deals with bodily decay. However, little is known or has been highlighted about the social consequences that living with and dealing with incontinence can have on informal carers. In this paper we examine the notion of dirty work and 'unbounded' bodies in the role of informal carers. Through qualitative interviews with carers of stroke survivors the negative social consequences of dealing with incontinence for both the survivor and the carer are explored. We also examine the strategies employed by carers and stroke survivors in order to manage the symptom in an attempt to prove the adult status of the survivor and to protect both the identity of the survivor and the carer. The embarrassment of leakage and the moral danger of odour can lead some carers and survivors to make decisions that can isolate both within the confines of their home. In this sense the very meaning of home is transformed into an isolated and marginalised space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17509743     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  15 in total

Review 1.  Needs of Stroke Survivors as Perceived by Their Caregivers: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Shilpa Krishnan; Monique R Pappadis; Susan C Weller; Marsja Stearnes; Amit Kumar; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Timothy A Reistetter
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Beyond incontinence: the stigma of other urinary symptoms.

Authors:  Emily A Elstad; Simone P Taubenberger; Elizabeth M Botelho; Sharon L Tennstedt
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Relationships among symptom severity, coping styles, and quality of life in community-dwelling women with urinary incontinence: a multiple mediator model.

Authors:  Dongjuan Xu; Nana Liu; Haili Qu; Liqin Chen; Kefang Wang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Patients' experiences of seeking health care for lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Lisa C Welch; Simone Taubenberger; Sharon L Tennstedt
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Race and ethnic differences in health beliefs about lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Lisa C Welch; Elizabeth M Botelho; Sharon L Tennstedt
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Systematic voiding programme in adults with urinary incontinence following acute stroke: the ICONS-II RCT.

Authors:  Caroline Watkins; Svetlana Tishkovskaya; Chris Brown; Chris Sutton; Yvonne Sylvestre Garcia; Denise Forshaw; Gordon Prescott; Lois Thomas; Christine Roffe; Joanne Booth; Kina Bennett; Brenda Roe; Bruce Hollingsworth; Ceu Mateus; David Britt; Cliff Panton
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 4.106

7.  Interventions for treating urinary incontinence after stroke in adults.

Authors:  Lois H Thomas; Jacqueline Coupe; Lucy D Cross; Aidan L Tan; Caroline L Watkins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-01

8.  Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE): an international cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate two models of facilitation informed by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework.

Authors:  Kate Seers; Jo Rycroft-Malone; Karen Cox; Nicola Crichton; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Ann Catrine Eldh; Carole A Estabrooks; Gill Harvey; Claire Hawkes; Carys Jones; Alison Kitson; Brendan McCormack; Christel McMullan; Carole Mockford; Theo Niessen; Paul Slater; Angie Titchen; Teatske van der Zijpp; Lars Wallin
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 9.  Assessing the stigma content of urinary incontinence intervention outcome measures.

Authors:  Kenneth Southall; Joshua R Tuazon; Abdul H Djokhdem; Eleanor A van den Heuvel; Walter Wittich; Jeffrey W Jutai
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2017-11-01

10.  How users of indwelling urinary catheters talk about sex and sexuality: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alison Chapple; Suman Prinjha; Helen Salisbury
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.