Literature DB >> 17509671

Safety, feasibility, and costs of outpatient laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic nodal dissection for locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

Todd Tillmanns1, M Patrick Lowe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report on the safety, feasibility, and costs of outpatient laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic lymph node dissection (LEPSS) for locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all outpatient LEPSS procedures performed at our institution between August 2005 and February 2007 was performed. All patients with clinical stage IIB-IVA cervical carcinoma with no evidence of bulky aortic lymphadenopathy (>1.0 cm) on pre-operative computed tomography were offered the procedure. If present, pelvic nodal disease could not exceed greater than 1.5 cm. Records were reviewed for demographics, operative findings, complications, length of stay, and CT scan aortic nodal status. As a comparison, the average costs for outpatient LEPSS and outpatient CT, MRI, and PET scan at our institution were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of eighteen outpatient LEPSS procedures were identified. The median age was 49 (22-72). The median BMI was 29 (18-51). The median operative time was 108 min (60-135 min). The median aortic nodal count was 10 (5-20 nodes). The median blood loss was 25 ml (10-50 ml). There were no intraoperative complications. There was no conversion from a retroperitoneal to a transperitoneal approach. No patient required overnight hospitalization. One patient experienced a lymphocyst postoperatively. There was no delay in the initiation of chemoradiation for any of the patients with a median onset of 10 days from the date of surgery. At least 20% of the patients had one or more medical co-morbidities such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, or a prior abdominal surgery. Occult aortic nodal metastasis was detected in 11% of the patients with a negative pre-operative CT scan. The average calculated costs at our institution for outpatient LEPSS was $5233 dollars versus $1520 dollars for CT scan, $4830 dollars for MRI and $5494 dollars for a PET scan.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first reported experience of outpatient laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic lymph node dissection for locally advanced cervical cancer. Outpatient LEPSS appears to be a safe and feasible procedure in the hands of an experienced surgeon, however further study is warranted. From a cost analysis perspective, outpatient LEPSS appears equivalent to PET scan and MRI, but is more expensive than CT scan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17509671     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of single-port laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Delphine Hudry; Francesco Cannone; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Max Buttarelli; Camille Jauffret; Elisabeth Chéreau; Eric Lambaudie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: assessment after 52 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Sébastien Gouy; Catherine Uzan; Stéphanie Scherier; Tristan Gauthier; Enrica Bentivegna; Aminata Kane; Philippe Morice; Frédéric Marchal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Marilyn Huang; Brian M Slomovitz; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

Review 4.  Analysis of morbidity and clinical implications of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in a continuous series of 98 patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer and negative PET-CT imaging in the para-aortic area.

Authors:  Catherine Uzan; Amine Souadka; Sebastien Gouy; Thierry Debaere; Juliette Duclos; Jean Lumbroso; Christine Haie-Meder; Philippe Morice
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-06-09

5.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?

Authors:  Fatih Gucer; Selim Misirlioglu; Nuri Ceydeli; Cagatay Taskiran
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-03-02

6.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Anuja Jhingran; Homer A Macapinlac; Elizabeth D Euscher; Mark F Munsell; Robert L Coleman; Pamela T Soliman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Michael Frumovitz; Lois M Ramondetta
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Conventional Laparoscopy versus Robotic-Assisted Aortic Lymph-Nodal Staging for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mariano Catello Di Donna; Vincenzo Giallombardo; Giuseppina Lo Balbo; Giuseppe Cucinella; Giulio Sozzi; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Antonino Abbate; Antonio Simone Laganà; Simone Garzon; Vito Chiantera
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Operative and anesthetic outcomes in endometrial cancer staging via three minimally invasive methods.

Authors:  Nicole D Fleming; Allison E Axtell; Scott E Lentz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-11-01

9.  Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy--a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sean C Dowdy; Giovanni Aletti; William A Cliby; Karl C Podratz; Andrea Mariani
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Robotic surgery for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Javier F Magrina; Vanna L Zanagnolo
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.