Literature DB >> 17508338

Seasonal variability in otariid energetics: implications for the effects of predators on localized prey resources.

Terrie M Williams1, M Rutishauser, B Long, T Fink, J Gafney, H Mostman-Liwanag, D Casper.   

Abstract

Otariids, like other wild mammals, contend with a wide variety of energetic demands across seasons. However, due to the cryptic behaviors of this marine group, few studies have been able to examine longitudinal energetic costs or the potential impact of these costs on seasonal or annual prey requirements. Here we evaluated the changes in energy demand and intake of female California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) during reproductive (n=2 sea lions) and nonreproductive (n=3) periods. Monthly measurements included resting metabolic rate, blood hormone levels, body condition (blubber thickness and body mass), and caloric intake for adult sea lions throughout molting, late pregnancy, lactation, and postweaning. We found that maintenance energy demands decreased from 32.0 to 23.1 MJ d(-1) before pupping, remaining stable at 19.4+/-0.6 MJ d(-1) during lactation and postweaning. Energy intake rates to meet these demands showed marked changes with activity level and the reproductive cycle, reaching a peak intake of 3.6 times baseline levels during lactation. Translating this into prey demands, we find that 20,000 reproductively active females on San Nicolas Island rookeries would maximally require 4,950 metric tons of Pacific whiting during a month of the breeding season. This localized impact is reduced significantly with postbreeding dispersal and demonstrates the importance of considering spatial and temporal factors driving the energetic requirements of predators when designing marine protected areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17508338     DOI: 10.1086/518346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool        ISSN: 1522-2152            Impact factor:   2.247


  10 in total

1.  The cost of reproduction: differential resource specialization in female and male California sea otters.

Authors:  Emma A Elliott Smith; Seth D Newsome; James A Estes; M Tim Tinker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Swimming metabolic rates vary by sex and development stage, but not by species, in three species of Australian otariid seals.

Authors:  Monique A Ladds; David J Slip; Robert G Harcourt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Causes and consequences of marine mammal population declines in southwest Alaska: a food-web perspective.

Authors:  J A Estes; D F Doak; A M Springer; T M Williams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Context-dependent variability in the predicted daily energetic costs of disturbance for blue whales.

Authors:  Enrico Pirotta; Cormac G Booth; David E Cade; John Calambokidis; Daniel P Costa; James A Fahlbusch; Ari S Friedlaender; Jeremy A Goldbogen; John Harwood; Elliott L Hazen; Leslie New; Brandon L Southall
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Immune activity, body condition and human-associated environmental impacts in a wild marine mammal.

Authors:  Patrick M Brock; Ailsa J Hall; Simon J Goodman; Marilyn Cruz; Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Temporal allocation of foraging effort in female Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus).

Authors:  Andrew J Hoskins; John P Y Arnould
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Intrinsic and extrinsic influences on standard metabolic rates of three species of Australian otariid.

Authors:  Monique A Ladds; David J Slip; Robert G Harcourt
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.079

8.  Evidence of molting and the function of "rock-nosing" behavior in bowhead whales in the eastern Canadian Arctic.

Authors:  Sarah M E Fortune; William R Koski; Jeff W Higdon; Andrew W Trites; Mark F Baumgartner; Steven H Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Using accelerometers to develop time-energy budgets of wild fur seals from captive surrogates.

Authors:  Monique A Ladds; Marcus Salton; David P Hocking; Rebecca R McIntosh; Adam P Thompson; David J Slip; Robert G Harcourt
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Factors affecting energy expenditure in a declining fur seal population.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McHuron; Jeremy T Sterling; Daniel P Costa; Michael E Goebel
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.079

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.