Literature DB >> 17508270

Nurse-led cancer genetics clinics in primary and secondary care in varied ethnic population areas: interaction with primary care to improve ascertainment of individuals from ethnic minorities.

Zohra Gulzar1, Sheila Goff, Albert Njindou, Heather Hearty, Imran Rafi, Rosie Savage, Gaya Matta, Julie Ferras, Shirley Hodgson.   

Abstract

Genetic services are receiving increasing numbers of referrals of people with a family history of cancer for assessment of genetic risk, and therefore need to find cost-effective ways of meeting this rising demand. General Practitioners (GPs) are known to be reluctant to take on genetic consultations. Current evidence suggests that black and ethnic minorities are poorly represented in cancer genetics clinics. Nurse-led clinics in primary care have been found to be successful. This paper reports a pilot study to test the feasibility, accessibility, and effectiveness of providing cancer genetics nurse-counsellor clinics in primary and secondary care in the SW Thames Region. We initially set up three nurse-led clinics in general practices and two in district hospitals with very different ethnic catchment areas. The service was advertised by displaying posters and leaflets, translated into different languages. Self-referrals were encouraged. We set up a user involvement sub-group and held two focus group meetings to assess barriers to, and satisfaction with, the service. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was designed and administered after the appointments. We also designed a GP satisfaction survey regarding the service. Data on referrals, including their source and outcome, were recorded on a purpose-designed study database. We received increasing numbers of referrals to all clinics over the course of the pilot. Of 137 referrals, 23 (17%) were from ethnic minorities, of whom 17/23 (74%) were self-referred, compared with 102 British White referrals, of whom 91/102 (89%) were self-referred. Sixty-two patients (45%) were assessed to be at population risk and reassured, 60 (44%) were at moderate risk, and 15 (11%) were at high risk and were referred on for appropriate management. These proportions were similar for black and ethnic minority patients. Most patients reported high satisfaction with the service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17508270     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-007-9128-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  33 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services.

Authors:  J Emery; E Watson; P Rose; A Andermann
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Raising concerns about family history of breast cancer in primary care consultations: prospective, population based study. Women's Concerns Study Group.

Authors:  F Hyland; A L Kinmonth; T M Marteau; S Griffin; P Murrell; D Spiegelhalter; C Todd; F Walter; B Berrington; M Bobrow; J Mackay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-06

3.  Cancer genetics--survey of primary care physicians' attitudes and practices.

Authors:  L C Friedman; S E Plon; H P Cooper; A D Weinberg
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Racial and ethnic differences in a patient survey: patients' values, ratings, and reports regarding physician primary care performance in a large health maintenance organization.

Authors:  J L Murray-García; J V Selby; J Schmittdiel; K Grumbach; C P Quesenberry
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Life expectancy gains from cancer prevention strategies for women with breast cancer and BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  D Schrag; K M Kuntz; J E Garber; J C Weeks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors.

Authors:  Sue Horrocks; Elizabeth Anderson; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

7.  Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial.

Authors:  M O Mundinger; R L Kane; E R Lenz; A M Totten; W Y Tsai; P D Cleary; W T Friedewald; A L Siu; M L Shelanski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-01-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  What motivates interest in attending a familial cancer genetics clinic?

Authors:  L Fraser; S Bramald; C Chapman; C Chu; V Cornelius; F Douglas; A Lucassen; A Nehammer; S Sutton; M Trivella; S Hodgson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.446

10.  The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; V Blair; R Greenhalgh; P Hopwood; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  What hinders minority ethnic access to cancer genetics services and what may help?

Authors:  Anna Allford; Nadeem Qureshi; Julian Barwell; Celine Lewis; Joe Kai
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.