Literature DB >> 17507644

Relationship between interhemispheric inhibition and motor cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients.

Cathrin M Bütefisch1, Marion Wessling, Johannes Netz, Rüdiger J Seitz, Volker Hömberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of stroke patients using functional imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) demonstrated increased recruitment and abnormally decreased short interval cortical inhibition (SICI) of the M1 contralateral to the lesioned hemisphere (contralesional M1) within the first month after infarction of the M1 or its corticospinal projections.
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to identify mechanisms underlying decreased SICI of the contralesional M1.
METHODS: In patients within 6 weeks of their first ever infarction of the M1 or its corticospinal projections, SICI in the M1 of the lesioned and nonlesioned hemisphere was studied using paired-pulse TMS. Interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) was measured by applying TMS to the M1 of the lesioned hemisphere and a second pulse to the homotopic M1 of the nonlesioned hemisphere and vice versa with the patient at rest. The results were compared to M1 stimulation of age-matched healthy controls.
RESULTS: SICI was decreased in the M1 of lesioned and nonlesioned hemispheres regardless of cortical or subcortical infarct location. IHI was abnormally decreased from the M1 of the lesioned on nonlesioned hemisphere. In contrast, IHI was normal from the M1 of the nonlesioned on the lesioned hemisphere. Abnormal IHI and SICI were correlated in patients with cortical but not with subcortical lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: In subacute stroke patients, abnormally decreased SICI of a contralesional M1 can only partially be explained by loss of IHI from the lesioned on nonlesioned hemisphere. As decreased SICI of the contralesional M1 did not result in excessive IHI from the nonlesioned on lesioned hemisphere with subsequent suppression of ipsilesional M1 excitability and all patients showed excellent recovery of motor function, decreased SICI of the contralesional M1 may represent an adaptive process supporting recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17507644     DOI: 10.1177/1545968307301769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  87 in total

1.  [Neurological rehabilitation].

Authors:  V Hömberg
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Impaired interlimb coordination of voluntary leg movements in poststroke hemiparesis.

Authors:  Shih-Chiao Tseng; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Motor demand-dependent improvement in accuracy following low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of left motor cortex.

Authors:  Cathrin M Buetefisch; Benjamin Hines; Linda Shuster; Paola Pergami; Adam Mathes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Modulation of cortical inhibition by rTMS - findings obtained from animal models.

Authors:  Klaus Funke; Alia Benali
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Characterizing differential poststroke corticomotor drive to the dorsi- and plantarflexor muscles during resting and volitional muscle activation.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Palmer; Ryan Zarzycki; Susanne M Morton; Trisha M Kesar; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Stroke subtype and motor impairment influence contralesional excitability.

Authors:  Gary W Thickbroom; Mar Cortes; Avrielle Rykman; Bruce T Volpe; Felipe Fregni; H Igo Krebs; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

8.  Enhanced motor function and its neurophysiological correlates after navigated low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in stroke.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Marine Vernet; Umer Najib; Jennifer Perez; Miguel Alonso-Alonso; Mark Knobel; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Dylan Edwards; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 9.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of functional recovery mechanisms after stroke.

Authors:  Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Effects of somatosensory stimulation on the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere in chronic stroke patients.

Authors:  Adriana B Conforto; Renata Laurenti dos Santos; Suzete Nascimento Farias; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Nadia Mangini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.