Literature DB >> 17507288

Transcranial electric stimulation for intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: Stimulation parameters and electrode montages.

Andrea Szelényi1, Karl F Kothbauer, Vedran Deletis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of constant current transcranial electric stimulation (TES) parameters for eliciting muscle motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the abductor pollicis brevis muscles (APB) and the tibialis anterior muscles (TA). The following parameters were tested intraoperatively: interstimulus interval (ISI), individual stimulation pulse duration within a train of five stimuli. Different montages of stimulating electrodes were assessed for effectiveness and focality. Further, reference values for APB and TA motor thresholds in neurosurgical patients with normal motor status under total intravenous anesthesia were determined.
METHODS: Motor thresholds of contralateral muscle MEPs were determined at 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.5 ms pulse duration and ISIs of 2, 3, 4, and 5 ms using a train of five monophasic constant current pulses with C3/C4 (27 patients). The stimulating electrodes were positioned at C1, C2, C3, C4, Cz, and Cz+6 cm. Different montages were used to determine the most effective and the most focal stimulation montages for the APB and TA muscles (30 patients). Eighty-six patients with clinically normal motor function were studied for motor threshold reference values.
RESULTS: The prolongation of the pulse duration has the strongest effect to decrease the motor threshold, which proportionally increases the delivered charge. The lowest stimulation threshold to elicit muscle MEPs in the APB and TA muscles is achieved with a train of stimuli consisting of an individual stimulus pulse duration of 0.5 ms. An ISI of 4 ms gave the lowest motor thresholds, but did not reach statistical significance compared to 3 ms. The stimulating electrode montage C3/C4 (C4/C3) allows for the lowest stimulation thresholds, but the vigorous muscle contractions it has is a disadvantage. The most focal stimulating electrode montages for the contralateral APB muscles are C3/Cz and C4/Cz, respectively, and for the TA muscles Cz/Cz+6 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: In adult neurosurgical patients with a normal motor status under total intravenous anesthesia, an individual pulse duration of 0.5 ms and an ISI of 4 ms provide the lowest motor thresholds. Pragmatically, C1/C2, resp., C2/C1 montage provides monitorable responses in both APB and TA muscles at reasonable stimulation thresholds without inducing movements disturbing surgery and especially microdissection. If the most focal hemispheric stimulation for the distal upper extremity muscles is required, the use of C3 or C4 referenced to Cz is recommended. SIGNIFICANCE: The stimulation parameters within a train of five pulses with an individual pulse duration of 0.5 ms and an ISI of 4 ms provide the lowest motor threshold. These data confirm not only studies for D wave recovery but also provide optimal stimulation parameters for intraoperative near threshold stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17507288     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  21 in total

1.  Basic methodological principles of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeries.

Authors:  Vedran Deletis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Awake surgery in low-grade gliomas harboring eloquent areas: 3-year mean follow-up.

Authors:  S Sarubbo; F Latini; A Panajia; C Candela; R Quatrale; P Milani; E Fainardi; E Granieri; G Trapella; V Tugnoli; M A Cavallo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Brain tumors in eloquent areas: A European multicenter survey of intraoperative mapping techniques, intraoperative seizures occurrence, and antiepileptic drug prophylaxis.

Authors:  Giannantonio Spena; Philippe Schucht; Kathleen Seidel; Geert-Jan Rutten; Christian Franz Freyschlag; Federico D'Agata; Emanule Costi; Francesca Zappa; Marco Fontanella; Denys Fontaine; Fabien Almairac; Michele Cavallo; Pasquale De Bonis; Gerardo Conesa; Nicholas Foroglou; Santiago Gil-Robles; Emanuel Mandonnet; Juan Martino; Thomas Picht; Catarina Viegas; Michel Wager; Johan Pallud
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  [Technique and advantages of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring for complex spinal interventions in older patients].

Authors:  M Campos-Friz; U Hubbe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  A practical guide for anesthetic management during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  Masahiko Kawaguchi; Hiroki Iida; Satoshi Tanaka; Naokazu Fukuoka; Hironobu Hayashi; Shunsuke Izumi; Kenji Yoshitani; Manabu Kakinohana
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Individualized Low-Amplitude Seizure Therapy: Minimizing Current for Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic Seizure Therapy.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Andrew D Krystal; Moacyr A Rosa; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Clinical and physiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation position on motor evoked potentials in scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Yl Lo; Yf Dan; Ye Tan; A Teo; Sb Tan; Wm Yue; Cm Guo; S Fook-Chong
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-02-23

8.  [Perioperative lesions of the corticospinal tract. Etiology, neuroradiological features and clinical outcome].

Authors:  E Hattingen; A Szelényi; J Rathert; S Blasel; F Zanella; S Weidauer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  The use of physiological mapping and monitoring during surgery for ependymomas.

Authors:  Rick Abbott
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Intraoperative Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring of the Facial Nerve during Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Resection.

Authors:  Maura K Cosetti; Ming Xu; Andrew Rivera; Daniel Jethanamest; Maggie A Kuhn; Aleksandar Beric; John G Golfinos; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.