Literature DB >> 17507244

Lateral meniscus allograft biologic glenoid arthroplasty in total shoulder arthroplasty for young shoulders with degenerative joint disease.

Gregory P Nicholson1, Jordan L Goldstein, Anthony A Romeo, Brian J Cole, Jennifer K Hayden, Stacy L Twigg, L Pearce McCarty, Alvin J Detterline.   

Abstract

To avoid potential polyethylene problems in younger shoulders with degenerative joint disease (DJD) requiring arthroplasty, lateral meniscus allograft (LMA) was used as a biologic resurfacing of the glenoid. We report preliminary, short-term results of this technique in a younger, higher-demand population. The shoulders of 20 men and 10 women, with an average age of 42 years (range, 18 to 52 years), underwent total shoulder arthroplasty with a LMA. A metallic prosthesis was used on the humerus. Etiology of the DJD was osteoarthritis in 16, postinstability surgery in 8, traumatic in 4, and failed open reduction with internal fixation in 2. Twenty-two (73%) had previous shoulder surgery. Preoperative average scores were American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), 38; Simple Shoulder Test (SST), 3.3; and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 6.4. The average active forward elevation was 96 degrees and external rotation was 26 degrees . Average follow-up was 18 months (range, 12 to 48 months). Postoperative average scores were ASES, 69; SST, 7.8; and VAS, 2.3. Active forward elevation was 139 degrees and external rotation was 53 degrees . All were significant improvements (P < .02). Most (94%) would have the surgery again. Radiologic evaluation at 1 year revealed an average joint space of 1.8 mm on anteroposterior views and 1.6 mm on axillary views. Five complications (17%) occurred within the first postoperative year, all of which required reoperation. Pain resulted in 2 conversions to a polyethylene glenoid. Polyethylene glenoids in young shoulders risk early failure. For young, high-demand shoulders with DJD requiring arthroplasty, the LMA shows promise. Most problems presented within the first year. Although not perfect, it provided significant pain relief, range-of-motion gains, and patient satisfaction without the risk of poly wear or loosening. Longer-term follow-up will be required to determine ultimate durability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17507244     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  16 in total

Review 1.  Foreign body reaction to acellular dermal matrix allograft in biologic glenoid resurfacing.

Authors:  Surena Namdari; Christopher Melnic; G Russell Huffman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Management of cartilage defects in the shoulder.

Authors:  Anthony A Depalma; Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

3.  The glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark Schrumpf; Travis Maak; Sommer Hammoud; Edward V Craig
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

4.  Topographic analysis of the glenoid and proximal medial tibial articular surfaces: a search for the ideal match for glenoid resurfacing.

Authors:  Anil K Gupta; Brian Forsythe; Andrew S Lee; Joshua D Harris; Frank McCormick; Geoffrey D Abrams; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo; Nozomu Inoue; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Meniscal Allograft Interposition Combined with Proximal Row Carpectomy.

Authors:  Murphy M Steiner; Matthew R Willsey; Frederick W Werner; Brian J Harley; Shay Klein; Kevin J Setter
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2016-08-05

6.  Clinical and radiographic mid-term outcomes after shoulder resurfacing in patients aged 50 years old or younger.

Authors:  G Merolla; P Bianchi; N Lollino; R Rossi; P Paladini; G Porcellini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-04-16

7.  What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Stacy M Russ; Phuong T Vu; Jason E Hsu; Robert M Lucas; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Progressive glenoid bone loss caused by erosion in humeral head resurfacing.

Authors:  B S Werner; J Stehle; A Abdelkawi; P Plumhoff; R Hudek; F Gohlke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Assessment of glenoid chondral healing: comparison of microfracture to autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis in a novel rabbit shoulder model.

Authors:  Vincent M Wang; Vasili Karas; Andrew S Lee; Ziying Yin; Geoffrey S Van Thiel; Kristen Hussey; D Rick Sumner; Susan Chubinskaya; Richard L Magin; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo; Brian J Cole
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Glenohumeral joint preservation: a review of management options for young, active patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Olivier A van der Meijden; Trevor R Gaskill; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.