Literature DB >> 17505450

[Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial].

M Morelli1, M Caruso, R Noia, D Chiodo, C Cosco, E Lucia, M Biamonte, F Zullo.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the effects of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with those of vaginal hysterectomy.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomised trial on 400 patients who agreed to be randomized to either laparoscopic total hysterectomy or vaginal hysterectomy. They were monitored for one year to evaluate the rate of major complications and the results on quality of life.
RESULTS: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher rate of major haemorrhages and ureteric injuries than vaginal hysterectomy (7% vs 2.5% and 2.5% vs 0%; P<0.05) only during the first year of study according to a normal learning-curve. It took longer to perform (85.9 min vs 46.6 min), but was less painful (visual analogue scale 5.3 vs 6.0; P<0.01) and there was a shorter stay in hospital after the operation (2.9 vs 3.3 days). Six weeks after the operation, total laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with less pain and better quality of life than vaginal hysterectomy (SF-12).
CONCLUSION: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a significantly higher rate of major haemorrhages and ureteric injuries than vaginal hysterectomy only during the first year of study according to a normal learning-curve. It took longer to perform but was associated with less pain, quicker recovery, and better short term quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17505450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Ginecol        ISSN: 0026-4784


  7 in total

1.  Occult Malignancy Rate of 1498 Hysterectomies or Myomectomies with Morcellation: A Retrospective Single-Arm Study.

Authors:  Garri Tchartchian; Bernd Bojahr; Sven Becker; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Vasilis Tanos; Hugo C Verhoeven; Markus Wallwiener; Rudy L De Wilde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-12-04

2.  Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology Does Not Yield More Perioperative Complications than Abdominal or Vaginal Hysterectomies: Our Experience in Introducing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Akimasa Takahashi; Mao Uemura; Jun Kitazawa; Mari Nakata; Yoshihiko Hayashi
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2020-10-15

3.  Comparison of two bipolar systems in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Hye-Yon Cho; Kong-Ju Choi; Young-Lan Lee; Kylie Hae-Jin Chang; Hong-Bae Kim; Sung-Ho Park
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 4.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12

5.  Natural orifice surgery: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Santiago Horgan; John P Cullen; Mark A Talamini; Yoav Mintz; Alberto Ferreres; Garth R Jacobsen; Bryan Sandler; Julie Bosia; Thomas Savides; David W Easter; Michelle K Savu; Sonia L Ramamoorthy; Emily Whitcomb; Sanjay Agarwal; Emily Lukacz; Guillermo Dominguez; Pedro Ferraina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Transvaginal laparoscopic appendectomy simultaneously with vaginal hysterectomy: initial experience of 10 cases.

Authors:  Yu Tian; Shuo-Dong Wu; Ying-Han Chen; Dan-Bo Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-10-10

7.  Factors for a Successful Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Very Large Uteri.

Authors:  Harald Krentel; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2017-09-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.