Literature DB >> 17505097

Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.

M Koutalonis1, H Delis, G Spyrou, L Costaridou, G Tzanakos, G Panayiotakis.   

Abstract

Magnification views are a common way to perform a secondary examination when suspicious abnormalities are found in a screening mammogram. The visibility of microcalcifications and breast lesions is restricted by the compromise between the image quality and the absorbed dose. In this study, image quality characteristics in magnification mammography were evaluated based on Monte Carlo techniques. A breast phantom was utilized, simulating a homogeneous mixture of adipose and glandular tissue in various percentages of glandularity, containing inhomogeneities of various sizes and compositions. The effect of the magnification degree, breast glandularity, tube voltage and anode/filter material combination on image quality characteristics was investigated in terms of a contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). A performance index PI(nu) was introduced in order to study the overall performance of various anode/filter combinations under different exposure parameters. Results demonstrate that CNR is improved with the degree of magnification and degraded as the breast glandularity is increased. Degree of magnification 1.3 offers the best overall performance for most of the anode/filter combinations utilized. Under magnification conditions, the role of dose is demoted against the image quality, as magnification views are secondary, diagnostic examinations and not screening procedures oriented to non-symptomatic women. For decreased image quality weighting, some anode/filter combinations different from Mo/0.030 mmMo can be utilized as they offer a similar performance index. However, if the desired weighting for the image quality is high, the Mo/0.030 mmMo combination has the best overall performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17505097     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/11/017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  Can electronic zoom replace magnification in mammography? A comparative Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  M Koutalonis; H Delis; A Pascoal; G Spyrou; L Costaridou; G Panayiotakis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Optimization of Image Quality and Dose in Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Agnes M F Fausto; M C Lopes; M C de Sousa; Tânia A C Furquim; Anderson W Mol; Fermin G Velasco
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Effectiveness of Non-Local Means Algorithm with an Industrial 3 MeV LINAC High-Energy X-Ray System for Non-Destructive Testing.

Authors:  Kyuseok Kim; Jaegu Choi; Youngjin Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.