PURPOSE: Improving outcomes for early-stage lung cancer is a major research focus at present because a significant proportion of stage I patients develop recurrent disease within 5 years of curative-intent lung resection. Within tumor stage groups, conventional prognostic indicators currently fail to predict relapse accurately. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To identify a gene signature predictive of recurrence in primary lung adenocarcinoma, we analyzed gene expression profiles in a training set of 48 node-negative tumors (stage I-II), comparing tumors from cases who remained disease-free for a minimum of 36 months with those from cases whose disease recurred within 18 months of complete resection. RESULTS: Cox proportional hazards modeling with leave-one-out cross-validation identified a 54-gene signature capable of predicting risk of recurrence in two independent validation cohorts of 55 adenocarcinomas [log-rank P=0.039; hazard ratio (HR), 2.2; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.1-4.7] and 40 adenocarcinomas (log-rank P=0.044; HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-7.9). Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis found that predicted poor-outcome groups had significantly shorter survival, and furthermore, the signature predicted outcome independently of conventional indicators of tumor stage and node stage. In a subset of earliest stage adenocarcinomas, generally expected to have good outcome, the signature predicted samples with significantly poorer survival. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a 54-gene signature that predicts the risk of recurrent disease independently of tumor stage and which therefore has potential to refine clinical prognosis for patients undergoing resection for primary adenocarcinoma of the lung.
PURPOSE: Improving outcomes for early-stage lung cancer is a major research focus at present because a significant proportion of stage I patients develop recurrent disease within 5 years of curative-intent lung resection. Within tumor stage groups, conventional prognostic indicators currently fail to predict relapse accurately. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To identify a gene signature predictive of recurrence in primary lung adenocarcinoma, we analyzed gene expression profiles in a training set of 48 node-negative tumors (stage I-II), comparing tumors from cases who remained disease-free for a minimum of 36 months with those from cases whose disease recurred within 18 months of complete resection. RESULTS: Cox proportional hazards modeling with leave-one-out cross-validation identified a 54-gene signature capable of predicting risk of recurrence in two independent validation cohorts of 55 adenocarcinomas [log-rank P=0.039; hazard ratio (HR), 2.2; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.1-4.7] and 40 adenocarcinomas (log-rank P=0.044; HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-7.9). Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis found that predicted poor-outcome groups had significantly shorter survival, and furthermore, the signature predicted outcome independently of conventional indicators of tumor stage and node stage. In a subset of earliest stage adenocarcinomas, generally expected to have good outcome, the signature predicted samples with significantly poorer survival. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a 54-gene signature that predicts the risk of recurrent disease independently of tumor stage and which therefore has potential to refine clinical prognosis for patients undergoing resection for primary adenocarcinoma of the lung.
Authors: Dung-Tsa Chen; Ying-Lin Hsu; William J Fulp; Domenico Coppola; Eric B Haura; Timothy J Yeatman; W Douglas Cress Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Johannes R Kratz; Jianxing He; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Zhi-Hua Zhu; Wen Gao; Patrick T Pham; Michael S Mulvihill; Fatemeh Ziaei; Huanrong Zhang; Bo Su; Xiuyi Zhi; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel; Qiuhua Deng; Zongfei Wang; Jiangfen Zhou; Huiling Li; Mei-Chun Huang; Che-Chung Yeh; Mark R Segal; M Roshni Ray; Kirk D Jones; Dan J Raz; Zhidong Xu; Thierry M Jahan; David Berryman; Biao He; Michael J Mann; David M Jablons Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Paul C Boutros; Suzanne K Lau; Melania Pintilie; Ni Liu; Frances A Shepherd; Sandy D Der; Ming-Sound Tsao; Linda Z Penn; Igor Jurisica Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-02-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jens Neumann; Friedrich Feuerhake; Gian Kayser; Thorsten Wiech; Konrad Aumann; Bernward Passlick; Paul Fisch; Martin Werner; Axel Zur Hausen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-03-02 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Morgan R Davidson; Jill E Larsen; Ian A Yang; Nicholas K Hayward; Belinda E Clarke; Edwina E Duhig; Linda H Passmore; Rayleen V Bowman; Kwun M Fong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M H W Starmans; B Krishnapuram; H Steck; H Horlings; D S A Nuyten; M J van de Vijver; R Seigneuric; F M Buffa; A L Harris; B G Wouters; P Lambin Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 7.640