Literature DB >> 17504772

Supertrees disentangle the chimerical origin of eukaryotic genomes.

Davide Pisani1, James A Cotton, James O McInerney.   

Abstract

Eukaryotes are traditionally considered to be one of the three natural divisions of the tree of life and the sister group of the Archaebacteria. However, eukaryotic genomes are replete with genes of eubacterial ancestry, and more than 20 mutually incompatible hypotheses have been proposed to account for eukaryote origins. Here we test the predictions of these hypotheses using a novel supertree-based phylogenetic signal-stripping method, and recover supertrees of life based on phylogenies for up to 5,741 single gene families distributed across 185 genomes. Using our signal-stripping method, we show that there are three distinct phylogenetic signals in eukaryotic genomes. In order of strength, these link eukaryotes with the Cyanobacteria, the Proteobacteria, and the Thermoplasmatales, an archaebacterial (euryarchaeotes) group. These signals correspond to distinct symbiotic partners involved in eukaryote evolution: plastids, mitochondria, and the elusive host lineage. According to our whole-genome data, eukaryotes are hardly the sister group of the Archaebacteria, because up to 83% of eukaryotic genes with a prokaryotic homolog have eubacterial, not archaebacterial, origins. The results reject all but two of the current hypotheses for the origin of eukaryotes: those assuming a sulfur-dependent or hydrogen-dependent syntrophy for the origin of mitochondria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17504772     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  87 in total

Review 1.  The falsifiability of the models for the origin of eukaryotes.

Authors:  Matej Vesteg; Juraj Krajčovič
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.886

2.  Reconstructing the fungal tree of life using phylogenomics and a preliminary investigation of the distribution of yeast prion-like proteins in the fungal kingdom.

Authors:  Edgar M Medina; Gary W Jones; David A Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Biochemistry and evolution of anaerobic energy metabolism in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Miklós Müller; Marek Mentel; Jaap J van Hellemond; Katrin Henze; Christian Woehle; Sven B Gould; Re-Young Yu; Mark van der Giezen; Aloysius G M Tielens; William F Martin
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 4.  The origin of eukaryotes and their relationship with the Archaea: are we at a phylogenomic impasse?

Authors:  Simonetta Gribaldo; Anthony M Poole; Vincent Daubin; Patrick Forterre; Céline Brochier-Armanet
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Eukaryotic genes of archaebacterial origin are more important than the more numerous eubacterial genes, irrespective of function.

Authors:  James A Cotton; James O McInerney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The energetics of genome complexity.

Authors:  Nick Lane; William Martin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  The ring of life hypothesis for eukaryote origins is supported by multiple kinds of data.

Authors:  James McInerney; Davide Pisani; Mary J O'Connell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Split-based computation of majority-rule supertrees.

Authors:  Anne Kupczok
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Dealing with incongruence in phylogenomic analyses.

Authors:  Nicolas Galtier; Vincent Daubin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Gene and genome trees conflict at many levels.

Authors:  Leanne S Haggerty; Fergal J Martin; David A Fitzpatrick; James O McInerney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.