Literature DB >> 17504372

Professionals' and patients' views of routine follow-up: a questionnaire survey.

F M Kew1, K Galaal, H Manderville, L Verleye.   

Abstract

Traditionally, women who have been treated for a gynecological cancer have undergone long-term follow-up by hospital doctors. Recently, there has been interest in alternative models of follow-up, including nurse-based review. The project compares patients' and professionals' views of follow-up. A questionnaire was completed by 96 women attending routine follow-up clinics and by 32 professionals involved in delivering follow-up. A large majority of women (82/96, 92%) and professionals (25/34, 73%) thought that follow-up should be provided by a hospital doctor. However, professionals were more likely to think that specialist nurses and general practitioners should be involved in the provision of follow-up (P < 0.01). Professionals thought that the most important part of the follow-up visit was the consultation, whereas women thought it was the examination (P < 0.001). Women thought that detection of recurrence was the most important reason for continuing surveillance, whereas professionals regarded addressing patients' concerns as the primary reason for follow-up (P < 0.001). We conclude that the views of women undergoing follow-up after gynecological cancer differ significantly from the professionals providing follow-up care. These views must be considered when developing alternative follow-up strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17504372     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00839.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  5 in total

1.  Follow-up care in cancer: adjusting for referral targets and extending choice.

Authors:  Kate Wilson; Anne Lydon; Ziv Amir
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Follow-up of patients who are clinically disease-free after primary treatment for fallopian tube, primary peritoneal, or epithelial ovarian cancer: a Program in Evidence-Based Care guideline adaptation.

Authors:  T Le; E B Kennedy; J Dodge; L Elit
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Follow-up care for cancer survivors: views of the younger adult.

Authors:  K Absolom; C Eiser; G Michel; S J Walters; B W Hancock; R E Coleman; J A Snowden; D M Greenfield
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  The value of serum CA125 for the development of virtual follow-up strategies for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Varughese; Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.234

5.  Gynaecological cancer follow-up: national survey of current practice in the UK.

Authors:  Simon Leeson; Nick Stuart; Yvonne Sylvestre; Liz Hall; Rhiannon Whitaker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.