Literature DB >> 17504336

Diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of the circumferential margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer.

S Purkayastha1, P P Tekkis, T Athanasiou, H S Tilney, A W Darzi, A G Heriot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Circumferential margin involvement (CMI) is an important prognostic indicator for patients with rectal cancer. This meta-analysis aims at evaluating the diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the preoperative evaluation of CMI in patients with rectal cancer.
METHOD: Quantitative meta-analysis was performed comparing MRI against histology after total mesorectal excision. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated for each study. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and subgroup analysis were undertaken. Study quality and heterogeneity were evaluated. Meta-regression meta-analysis was used to evaluate the significance of the difference in relative DORs.
RESULTS: Nine studies evaluating 529 patients were included. Pooled results showed an overall sensitivity and specificity for MRI detecting CMI preoperatively of 94% and 85% respectively. The SROC analysis demonstrated an overall weighted area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 (DOR 57.21, 95% CI 18.21-179.77), without significant heterogeneity between the studies (Q-value 14.66, P = 0.06). Good study quality further increased the sensitivity and specificity of MRI. The use of a 1.5 Tesla coil, a phased array coil and the inclusion of two interpreters also resulted in high preoperative diagnostic precision. Meta-regression meta-analysis showed a significant difference in the DOR for studies published in or since 2003 (P = 0.019).
CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging can accurately predict CMI preoperatively for rectal cancer in single units and this is reproducible across different centres. This strategy has important implications for selection of patients for adjuvant therapy prior to surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17504336     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01104.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  14 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of imaging in rectal cancer: multimodality imaging with MDCT, MRI, and PET.

Authors:  Siva P Raman; Yifei Chen; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Suk Hee Heo; Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung-Keun Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Do all locally advanced rectal cancers require radiation? A review of literature in the modern era.

Authors:  David T Vonk; Lisa J Hazard
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2010-09

4.  Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity after MRI assessment and adjuvant treatment in 189 patients undergoing rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  G S Simpson; N Eardley; F McNicol; P Healey; M Hughes; P S Rooney
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Beyond Histologic Staging: Emerging Imaging Strategies in Colorectal Cancer with Special Focus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Tyler J Fraum; Joseph W Owen; Kathryn J Fowler
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 6.  Management of stage IV rectal cancer: palliative options.

Authors:  Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  An evaluation of four CT-MRI co-registration techniques for radiotherapy treatment planning of prone rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  C J Dean; J R Sykes; R A Cooper; P Hatfield; B Carey; S Swift; S E Bacon; D Thwaites; D Sebag-Montefiore; A M Morgan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology.

Authors:  M Anzidei; A Napoli; F Zaccagna; P Di Paolo; C Zini; B Cavallo Marincola; D Geiger; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  MRI in T staging of rectal cancer: How effective is it?

Authors:  Mg Mulla; R Deb; R Singh
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2010-05

10.  Prospective phase II study of preoperative short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer with twice daily fractions of 2.9 Gy to a total dose of 29 Gy--long-term results.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Joern Wulf; Andreas Thalheimer; Daniel Wehner; Arnulf Thiede; Gottfried Müller; Marco Sailer; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.