Literature DB >> 17504156

MRI contrast agents: current status and future perspectives.

Gustav J Strijkers1, Willem J M Mulder, Geralda A F van Tilborg, Klaas Nicolay.   

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in clinical diagnostics, for a rapidly growing number of indications. The MRI technique is non-invasive and can provide information on the anatomy, function and metabolism of tissues in vivo. MRI scans of tissue anatomy and function make use of the two hydrogen atoms in water to generate the image. Apart from differences in the local water content, the basic contrast in the MR image mainly results from regional differences in the intrinsic relaxation times T(1) and T(2), each of which can be independently chosen to dominate image contrast. However, the intrinsic contrast provided by the water T(1) and T(2) and changes in their values brought about by tissue pathology are often too limited to enable a sensitive and specific diagnosis. For that reason increasing use is made of MRI contrast agents that alter the image contrast following intravenous injection. The degree and location of the contrast changes provide substantial diagnostic information. Certain contrast agents are predominantly used to shorten the T(1) relaxation time and these are mainly based on low-molecular weight chelates of the gadolinium ion (Gd(3+)). The most widely used T(2) shortening agents are based on iron oxide (FeO) particles. Depending on their chemical composition, molecular structure and overall size, the in vivo distribution volume and pharmacokinetic properties vary widely between different contrast agents and these largely determine their use in specific diagnostic tests. This review describes the current status, as well as recent and future developments of MRI contrast agents with focus on applications in oncology. First the basis of MR image contrast and how it is altered by contrast agents will be discussed. After some considerations on bioavailability and pharmacokinetics, specific applications of contrast agents will be presented according to their specific purposes, starting with non-specific contrast agents used in classical contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Next targeted contrast agents, which are actively directed towards a specific molecular target using an appropriate ligand, functional contrast agents, mainly used for functional brain and heart imaging, smart contrast agents, which generate contrast as a response to a change in their physical environment as a consequence of some biological process, and finally cell labeling agents will be presented. To conclude some future perspectives are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17504156     DOI: 10.2174/187152007780618135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem        ISSN: 1871-5206            Impact factor:   2.505


  43 in total

1.  Manganese-based MRI contrast agents: past, present and future.

Authors:  Dipanjan Pan; Anne H Schmieder; Samuel A Wickline; Gregory M Lanza
Journal:  Tetrahedron       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.457

Review 2.  Revisiting an old friend: manganese-based MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Dipanjan Pan; Shelton D Caruthers; Angana Senpan; Ann H Schmieder; Samuel A Wickline; Gregory M Lanza
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2010-09-21

3.  Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanospheres with cleavable Gd(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: synthesis, characterization, target-specificity, and renal clearance.

Authors:  Juan L Vivero-Escoto; Kathryn M L Taylor-Pashow; Rachel C Huxford; Joseph Della Rocca; Christie Okoruwa; Hongyu An; Weili Lin; Wenbin Lin
Journal:  Small       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 13.281

4.  MRI stem cell tracking for therapy in experimental cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Pedro Ramos-Cabrer; Mathias Hoehn
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  Labelling of mammalian cells for visualisation by MRI.

Authors:  Monique R Bernsen; Amber D Moelker; Piotr A Wielopolski; Sandra T van Tiel; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Solid MRI contrast agents for long-term, quantitative in vivo oxygen sensing.

Authors:  Vincent H Liu; Christophoros C Vassiliou; Syed M Imaad; Michael J Cima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The application of nanoparticles in gene therapy and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fernando Herranz; Elena Almarza; Ignacio Rodríguez; Beatriz Salinas; Yamilka Rosell; Manuel Desco; Jeff W Bulte; Jesús Ruiz-Cabello
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 8.  MRI in multiple sclerosis: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Rohit Bakshi; Alan J Thompson; Maria A Rocca; Daniel Pelletier; Vincent Dousset; Frederik Barkhof; Matilde Inglese; Charles R G Guttmann; Mark A Horsfield; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Molecular imaging without radiopharmaceuticals?

Authors:  John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov; Todd E Peterson; Malcolm J Avison
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Iron oxide core oil-in-water emulsions as a multifunctional nanoparticle platform for tumor targeting and imaging.

Authors:  Peter A Jarzyna; Torjus Skajaa; Anita Gianella; David P Cormode; Daniel D Samber; Stephen D Dickson; Wei Chen; Arjan W Griffioen; Zahi A Fayad; Willem J M Mulder
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.